2009
DOI: 10.2166/wst.2009.510
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Upgrading of the anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge by combining temperature-phased anaerobic digestion and intermediate ozonation

Abstract: Upgrading of the anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge (WAS) by the combination of temperature-phased two-stage digestion and intermediate ozonation was investigated by a continuous experiment with two processes, TM and TOM. The TM process is a temperature-phased two-stage system, which consists of a thermophilic digester and a mesophilic digester in series. The TOM process is a temperature-phased two-stage process with the intermediate ozonation. Two processes were operated at hydraulic retention time… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…iTPAD), affected significantly the soluble organics content of the supernatant, and sCOD and ammonia concentrations were noticeably higher compared with those of the reference MAD. In fact, as reported elsewhere (Kobayashi et al, 2009;Vindis et al, 2009), the thermophilic conditions resulted in an increase in the soluble nitrogen compounds, mainly ammonium ions, with the related potential risks of inhibition of the whole process. However, no inhibitory effects were observed because the ammonia level in all the digesters was always lower with respect to the methane inhibition level of 2000 mg/L (Han et al, 1997) and, at the same time, the pH measured during the digestion processes was not extremely alkaline (average pH value of 8.1 6 0.2).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…iTPAD), affected significantly the soluble organics content of the supernatant, and sCOD and ammonia concentrations were noticeably higher compared with those of the reference MAD. In fact, as reported elsewhere (Kobayashi et al, 2009;Vindis et al, 2009), the thermophilic conditions resulted in an increase in the soluble nitrogen compounds, mainly ammonium ions, with the related potential risks of inhibition of the whole process. However, no inhibitory effects were observed because the ammonia level in all the digesters was always lower with respect to the methane inhibition level of 2000 mg/L (Han et al, 1997) and, at the same time, the pH measured during the digestion processes was not extremely alkaline (average pH value of 8.1 6 0.2).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…A niche application of AOPs could be the oxidation of refractory substances (e.g. mineralization of humic substances), or for the treatment of digested sludge, as it contains a higher fraction of refractory substances compared to WAS (Kobayashi et al, 2009).…”
Section: Effects On Wasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was due to solids degradation and solids sedimentation inside the digester (a discussion on this is provided in a subsequent section). Total ammonia nitrogen (TAN) concentration increased as the hydraulic retention time decreased, which could be due to the degradation of proteins and urea present in the sludge (Kobayashi et al, 2009). Other than the trial carried out at 5 days HRT, ammonia nitrogen concentrations reached 700 mg/L.…”
Section: Performance and Yields Of The Thermophilic Digester (P3)mentioning
confidence: 99%