2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2006.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uplift of the Ou Backbone Range in Northeast Japan at around 10 Ma and its implication for the tectonic evolution of the eastern margin of Asia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
80
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1000 m) to a sublittoral (<100 m) depositional environment during the Early Pleistocene (Matoba 1984). This large-scale shallowing of the depositional depth cannot be explained simply by the eustatic fall in sea level (about 100 m) but probably also reflects the uplift of northeastern Honshu Island with intensified compression (Sato 1994;Nakajima et al 2006), which occurred between 3.5 and 1.7 Ma (Sato et al 2012). Figure 3 shows schematically the lithofacies in a deep-sea core obtained during ODP Leg 127 (Tada 1994) and their correlations with typical on-land sections obtained in various districts of Japan.…”
Section: Geological and Geographic Settingsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1000 m) to a sublittoral (<100 m) depositional environment during the Early Pleistocene (Matoba 1984). This large-scale shallowing of the depositional depth cannot be explained simply by the eustatic fall in sea level (about 100 m) but probably also reflects the uplift of northeastern Honshu Island with intensified compression (Sato 1994;Nakajima et al 2006), which occurred between 3.5 and 1.7 Ma (Sato et al 2012). Figure 3 shows schematically the lithofacies in a deep-sea core obtained during ODP Leg 127 (Tada 1994) and their correlations with typical on-land sections obtained in various districts of Japan.…”
Section: Geological and Geographic Settingsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The Japan Basin is underlain by an oceanic-type crust, dated at around 24-17 Ma at the basaltic basement at ODP site 795, whereas the Yamato Basin, which is younger (21-18 Ma), is unlikely to be an oceanic-type crust Kaneoka et al 1992). The tectonic stress changed to compression after 3.5 Ma, causing the uplift of northeast Japan (e.g., Nakajima et al 2006). In the southwestern Japan Sea, a tectonic event, such as intra-arc folding under N-S compressive stress, resulted in the closure of the Tsushima Strait during the Late Miocene, and the attenuation of the N-S compression in southwest Japan seems to have been related to the reopening of the Tsushima Strait in the Late Pliocene (Itoh et al 1997).…”
Section: Geological and Geographic Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The three major evolutionary periods of the NE Japan arc can be further subdivided into 13 stages (Table 1 and Fig. 3) based on modes of volcanism, tectonic events and the inferred regional stress field (Ohguchi et al 1989;Sato 1994;Yoshida et al 1995;Nakajima et al 2006c;Yoshida 2001Yoshida , 2009. Figure 3 shows the migration of the position of the volcanic front in the NE Japan arc over the past 60 myr, where the age of each volcanic event is plotted against the distance from the Quaternary volcanic front (QVF).…”
Section: Temporal Evolution Of the Ne Japan Magmatic Arcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Migration of the volcanic front over the past 60 myr in the NE Japan arc (modified from Yoshida et al 1995;Yoshida 2001Yoshida , 2009) and subsidence curves for sedimentary basins in the back-arc side of Japan, Sakhalin (Kano et al 2007), and the Ou Backbone Range (Nakajima et al 2006c). The three major periods (continental margin, back-arc basin and island arc), subdivided into 13 stages of igneous activity (Ohguchi et al 1989;Sato 1994;Yoshida et al 1995;Nakajima et al 2006c;Yoshida 2001Yoshida , 2009, are defined in the text and compared with the eustatic curve proposed by Haq et al (1988). Some subsidence curves show a step pattern with flat thin lines and steep thick lines.…”
Section: Temporal Evolution Of the Ne Japan Magmatic Arcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 1990 19411959196619664 5 1971Fig. 2 , 2001, 1959, 1966;, 1966;, 1971;19711971 Fig 1959 , 1971; , 2000 150 210 m , 2000 2000 , 1971; 1972; , 1986; , 1986 , 1971; 1972, 1973, , 1974 14.0 1.1 Ma 11.7 0.9 Ma FT , 1999Blow 1969N10 14.8 12.7 Ma N13 14 12.1 11.4 Ma Martini 1971NN6 13.6 11.8 Ma , 2000Nakajima et al, 2006Nakajima et al, . , 2000Nakajima et al, 2006 Dimroth et al, 1978;Yamagishi, 1987Yamagishi, , 1991HY ML McPhie et al, 1993Yamagishi, 1979Yamagishi, , 1987 PE HY Busby-Spera and White, 1987;McPhie et al, 1993;Skilling et al, 2002;Yamagishi, 1987 2 Kitamura, N. and Muto, A. , 1962, .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%