2013 IEEE 18th International Workshop on Computer Aided Modeling and Design of Communication Links and Networks (CAMAD) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/camad.2013.6708099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uplink energy efficiency in LTE systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, we consider the impact of path-loss on the required transmission power as described in Eq. 14, following the work of [44]. From this test study, we notice how the heatmap gradient reflects an increase in power transmission required to achieve larger SNR values and, in turn, the possibility to adopt higher Modulation and Coding Schemes (MCS), as function of the distance from the robot and the serving base station.…”
Section: Scenario Characterization and Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, we consider the impact of path-loss on the required transmission power as described in Eq. 14, following the work of [44]. From this test study, we notice how the heatmap gradient reflects an increase in power transmission required to achieve larger SNR values and, in turn, the possibility to adopt higher Modulation and Coding Schemes (MCS), as function of the distance from the robot and the serving base station.…”
Section: Scenario Characterization and Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 83%
“…where G A T x and G A Rx are the antenna gains at transmitter and receiver, i.e., robot and BS, respectively, L C T x and L C Rx are the corresponding cable losses, and SN R T arget is the target SNR at the receiver side. Based on the results and findings of [44], we assume the transmission power consumption of the BB processing P T xBB to be approximately 2.12 W, and set L C T x and L C Rx 0dB and 0dB, respectively, and assign G A T x and G A Rx 10dB and 10dB, respectively. In case of downlink transmission (DL), we consider an average value of 4W according to the measurements of [38], and assume the receiving module always on, to enable reachability of the robot devices with control messages at any time.…”
Section: Scenario Setup and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To that end, the number of available data resource elements (REs) of resource blocks (RBs) belonging to the Physical Uplink Control Channel (PUCCH) is computed. Notice that the number of transmitted useful bits in each RE also depends on the used modulation and coding scheme (MCS), as explained in [14].…”
Section: A Lte Energy Efficiency Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For further information on the UL energy efficiency calculation in LTE, the reader may refer to [14].…”
Section: A Lte Energy Efficiency Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%