Upper Airway Collapsibility and Genioglossus Activity in Adolescents during Sleep

Huang, Jingtao; Pinto, Swaroop; Yuan, Haibo; Katz, Eliot S.; Karamessinis, Laurie; Bradford, Ruth; Gallagher, Paul R.; Hannigan, James; Nixon, Thomas; Ward, Robin; Lee, Yin N; Marcus, Carole L.

doi:10.5665/sleep.2110

Cited by 58 publications

(38 citation statements)

References 46 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…[30][31][32][33][34][35][36] Children with OSA are unable to activate airway tone to maintain airway patency. [37][38][39] The lack of sensation of nasal airflow, as by adenotonsillar hypertrophy or nasal obstruction common in the pediatric population, is associated with increased nasopharyngeal resistance and contributes to OSA, [40][41][42][43][44][45] suggesting that sensation of nasal airflow reduces airway resistance and elicits compensatory increase in pharyngeal tone. 36,46 Therefore, the delivery of heated and humidified air to the nasopharynx at higher than usual flow rates may activate, or reactivate, the protective airway reflex via nasopharyngeal mechanoreceptor or thermoreceptor stimulation, as well as reduce irritation, swelling, and congestion associated with dryness.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

High-Flow, Heated, Humidified Air Via Nasal Cannula Treats CPAP-Intolerant Children With Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Hawkins

Huston

Campbell

et al. 2017

Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Study Objectives: Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is effective but challenging for children with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). High-flow air via open nasal cannula (HFNC) as treatment in children remains controversial. We report the efficacy of HFNC in children with OSA and CPAP intolerance, a titration protocol, and a discussion of potential mechanisms. Methods: Patients aged 1 to 18 years with OSA (defined by obstructive apnea-hypopnea index [OAHI] greater than 1 event/h) and CPAP intolerance were enrolled. Routine polysomnography data obtained during 1 night wearing HFNC was compared with diagnostic data by Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Results: Ten school-age subjects (representing all patients attempting HFNC at our institution to date) with varied medical conditions, moderate to severe OSA, and CPAP intolerance wore HFNC from 10 to 50 L/min of room air with oxygen supplementation if needed (room air alone for 6 of the 10). HFNC reduced median OAHI from 11.1 events/h (interquartile range 8.7-18.8 events/h) to 2.1 events/h (1.7-2.2 events/h; P = .002); increased oxyhemoglobin saturation (SpO2) mean from 91.3% (89.6% to 93.5%) to 94.9% (92.4% to 96.0%; P < .002); increased SpO2 nadir from 76.0% (67.3% to 82.3%) to 79.5% (77.2% to 86.0%; P = .032); decreased SpO2 desaturation index from 19.2 events/h (12.7-25.8 events/h) to 6.4 events/h (4.7-10.7 events/h; P = .013); and reduced heart rate from 88 bpm (86-91 bpm) to 74 bpm (67-81 bpm; P = .004). Stratified analysis of the 6 subjects with only room air via HFNC, the OAHI, obstructive hypopnea index, and mean SpO2 still demonstrated improvements (P = .031). Conclusions: High-flow nasal cannula reduces respiratory events, improves oxygenation, reduces heart rate, and may be effective for CPAP intolerant children with moderate to severe OSA. Our data suggest HFNC warrants further study and consideration by payers as OSA therapy.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

High-Flow, Heated, Humidified Air Via Nasal Cannula Treats CPAP-Intolerant Children With Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Hawkins

Huston

Campbell

et al. 2017

Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Adolescents aged 12-16 years were recruited as part of a larger study evaluating the pathophysiology of OSAS (19)(20)(21)(22). Adolescents with OSAS were recruited from the Sleep Center at CHOP.…”

Section: Participantsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Understanding the Anatomic Basis for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome in Adolescents

Schwab

Kim

Bagchi

et al. 2015

Am J Respir Crit Care Med

Self Cite

104

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Rationale: Structural risk factors for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) in adolescents have not been well characterized. Because many adolescents with OSAS are obese, we hypothesized that the anatomic OSAS risk factors would be more similar to those in adults than those in children.Objectives: To investigate the anatomic risk factors in adolescents with OSAS compared with obese and lean control subjects using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).Methods: Three groups of adolescents (age range: 12-16 yr) underwent MRI: obese individuals with OSAS (n = 49), obese control subjects (n = 38), and lean control subjects (n = 50). Measurements and Main Results:We studied 137 subjects and found that (1) obese adolescents with OSAS had increased adenotonsillar tissue compared with obese and lean control subjects; (2) obese OSAS adolescents had a smaller nasopharyngeal airway than control subjects; (3) the size of other upper airway soft tissue structures (volume of the tongue, parapharyngeal fat pads, lateral walls, and soft palate) was similar between subjects with OSAS and obese control subjects; (4) although there were no major craniofacial abnormalities in most of the adolescents with OSAS, the ratio of soft tissue to craniofacial space surrounding the airway was increased; and (5) there were sex differences in the pattern of lymphoid proliferation.Conclusions: Increased size of the pharyngeal lymphoid tissue, rather than enlargement of the upper airway soft tissue structures, is the primary anatomic risk factor for OSAS in obese adolescents. These results are important for clinical decision making and suggest that adenotonsillectomy should be considered as the initial treatment for OSAS in obese adolescents, a group that has poor continuous positive airway pressure adherence and difficulty in achieving weight loss.Keywords: adenoid; adolescents; MRI; obstructive sleep apnea syndrome; tonsils The obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) is common in children and adults, but it has not been well studied in adolescents. In one study, researchers reported the prevalence of OSAS in adolescents to be 2% (1), but the prevalence is probably higher in the United States because of the adolescent obesity epidemic (2). OSAS in children is thought to be secondary to a combination of enlargement of the lymphoid tissue (tonsils and adenoid) (3) and, sometimes, obesity, as well as to reductions in neuromuscular tone (4). In adults, there are known anatomic risk factors for OSAS, including enlargement of the tongue, soft palate, parapharyngeal fat pads, and lateral pharyngeal walls (5) in conjunction with craniofacial restriction (retrognathia) (6). In addition to anatomic factors, physiologic mechanisms increase OSAS risk in both children and adults (7-12). Although these risk factors for OSAS have been well described in children and adults, few Supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (R01 HL058585, R01 HL089447, and P01 HL094307).Author Contributions: Conception and design: R.J.S., R.M.B., S.H., and C.L...

show abstract

“…However, these structural factors cannot fully explain the degree of upper airway collapsibility (1,2). Studies have shown that upper airway neuromotor tone and reflexes during sleep play an important role in maintaining airway patency during sleep in the pediatric population (3,4). Recently, it has been shown that central nervous system processing of upper airway respiratory stimuli is abnormal during sleep in children with OSAS (5).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Respiratory and Auditory Cortical Processing in Children with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome

Huang¹,

Marcus²,

Davenport³

et al. 2013

Am J Respir Crit Care Med

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Rationale: Children with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) have impaired cortical processing of respiratory afferent stimuli, manifested by blunted sleep respiratory-related evoked potentials (RREP). However, whether this impairment is limited to respiratory stimuli, or reversible after successful treatment, is unknown. We hypothesized that, during sleep, children with OSAS have (1) abnormal RREP, (2) normal cortical processing of nonrespiratory stimuli, and (3) persistence of abnormal RREP after treatment. Objectives: To measure sleep RREP and auditory evoked potentials in normal control subjects and children with OSAS before and after treatment. Methods: Twenty-four children with OSAS and 24 control subjects were tested during N3 sleep. Thirteen children with OSAS repeated testing 4-6 months after adenotonsillectomy. Measurements and Main Results: RREP were blunted in OSAS compared with control subjects (N350 at Cz 227 6 15.5 vs. 247.4 6 28.5 mV; P ¼ 0.019), and did not improve after OSAS treatment (N350 at Cz pretreatment 225.1 6 7.4 vs. 229.8 6 8.1 posttreatment). Auditory evoked potentials were similar in OSAS and control subjects at baseline (N350 at Cz 258 6 33.1 vs. 266 6 31.1 mV), and did not change after treatment (N350 at Cz 267.5 6 36.8 vs. 6 20.3).Conclusions: Children with OSAS have persistent primary or irreversible respiratory afferent cortical processing deficits during sleep that could put them at risk of OSAS recurrence. OSAS does not seem to affect the cortical processing of nonrespiratory (auditory) afferent stimuli during sleep.Keywords: evoked potentials; children; auditory; respiratory; obstructive sleep apnea syndromeThe pathophysiology of the childhood obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) is not clear. In most children, OSAS is related to adenotonsillar hypertrophy or obesity. However, these structural factors cannot fully explain the degree of upper airway collapsibility (1, 2). Studies have shown that upper airway neuromotor tone and reflexes during sleep play an important role in maintaining airway patency during sleep in the pediatric population (3, 4). Recently, it has been shown that central nervous system processing of upper airway respiratory stimuli is abnormal during sleep in children with OSAS (5). However, it is not known whether this abnormal afferent processing is limited to respiratory stimuli, or whether it is an indicator of broader abnormalities in stimulus processing, secondary to the hypoxemia, hypercapnia, and sleep fragmentation of OSAS. Furthermore, it is not known whether this deficit resolves after treatment of OSAS. Determining reversibility would help elucidate whether the blunted responses were a primary and perhaps predisposing abnormality, or were secondary to the OSAS.Respiratory-related evoked potentials (RREP) have been used to study the central nervous system processing of upper airway stimuli (6, 7). Auditory evoked potentials (AEP) are a useful tool to investigate cortical responses to nonrespiratory stimuli and produce the same set of longer...

show abstract

Upper Airway Collapsibility and Genioglossus Activity in Adolescents during Sleep

Cited by 58 publications

References 46 publications

High-Flow, Heated, Humidified Air Via Nasal Cannula Treats CPAP-Intolerant Children With Obstructive Sleep Apnea

High-Flow, Heated, Humidified Air Via Nasal Cannula Treats CPAP-Intolerant Children With Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Understanding the Anatomic Basis for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome in Adolescents

Respiratory and Auditory Cortical Processing in Children with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About