2007
DOI: 10.1136/bjsm.2007.038570
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Upper arm circumference is associated with race performance in ultra-endurance runners

Abstract: Objective:To investigate the association of anthropometric parameters to race performance in ultra-endurance runners in a multistage ultra-endurance run.Design:Descriptive field study.Setting:The Deutschlandlauf 2006 race in Germany, where athletes had to run 1200 km within 17 consecutive days. There were no interventions.Subjects:In total, there were 19 male Caucasian ultra-endurancerunners (mean (SD) 46.2 (9.6) years, 71.8 (5.2) kg, 179 (6) cm, BMI 22.5 (1.9) kg/m2).Main outcome measurements:Determination of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
72
1
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
72
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In other studies, body mass seems to have a marked effect on endurance performance (17). The effects of body mass and BMI on performance have been investigated in several studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In other studies, body mass seems to have a marked effect on endurance performance (17). The effects of body mass and BMI on performance have been investigated in several studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A further anthropometric characteristic related to endurance performance is the circumference of limbs of the upper arm, the thigh and the calf (15,17,29). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite that the possible influence of body mass and other morphologic variables on physical performance has been the subject of previous investigations in both anaerobic 19,20 and aerobic 21,22 activities, as well as in the comparison between genders 23 , the results reached so far are still in-conclusive since the magnitude of the contribution of these variables seems to depend on the characteristics of the motor task required. In this study it was believed that the motor performance in each test could be largely explained by the morphological variables, which was not confirmed, mainly in relation to body mass, fat mass, and lean body mass in the FKPU test.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Among these variables, the most important were age [16,21], anthropometric characteristics such as body fat [16,19], body mass index [22] and limb circumferences [23], training characteristics such as running speed [16,19,21] and training volume [16,19,21] and previous experience [24,25].…”
Section: Predictor Variables For Successful Ultra-marathon Runningmentioning
confidence: 99%