“…The study benefited from the fact that we were able to estimate both exposure intensity and exposure duration without recall-bias by linking registered D-ISCO 88 codes with The Shoulder JEM, which has shown good predictive validity in four studies 5–7 19. The exposure intensities of arm elevation and repetition were calibrated into measurement scales,15 and force intensities could be tentatively transformed into %MVE 16. The study also benefited from the fact that information on D-ISCO 88 codes, surgery for SIS and covariates was gathered through high-quality national longitudinal registers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For repetition, median angular velocities <45°/s seemed safe according to the present study. Examples of job groups that exceed 45 o /s are postal workers (58 o /s) and kitchen assistants (59 o /s) 15. In our case–control study, where we used cumulative exposure measures,7 a mean intensity of approximately 40 o /s across a 10-year time window yielded a significantly elevated OR adj of around 1.5, but the risk might have been overestimated as we were unable to control for cumulative effects of other occupational mechanical exposures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an update of the The Shoulder JEM, we calibrated the expert-rated arm elevation and repetition estimates against technical measurements to obtain exposure estimates on measurement scales (‘predicted measured job exposures’) as described previously 7 15. The technical measurements were obtained using inclinometry for 36 of the 172 job groups in The Shoulder JEM and comprised 575 whole day measurements 15. We used the predicted measured job exposures in our main analyses (arm elevation >90° (min/day), repetition (median angular velocity, °/s)).…”
We found indications of safe exposure intensities for repetition. Any intensities of force and upper arm elevation >90° above minimal implied an increased risk across 10-year exposure time windows. No independent associations were found for HAV.
“…The study benefited from the fact that we were able to estimate both exposure intensity and exposure duration without recall-bias by linking registered D-ISCO 88 codes with The Shoulder JEM, which has shown good predictive validity in four studies 5–7 19. The exposure intensities of arm elevation and repetition were calibrated into measurement scales,15 and force intensities could be tentatively transformed into %MVE 16. The study also benefited from the fact that information on D-ISCO 88 codes, surgery for SIS and covariates was gathered through high-quality national longitudinal registers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For repetition, median angular velocities <45°/s seemed safe according to the present study. Examples of job groups that exceed 45 o /s are postal workers (58 o /s) and kitchen assistants (59 o /s) 15. In our case–control study, where we used cumulative exposure measures,7 a mean intensity of approximately 40 o /s across a 10-year time window yielded a significantly elevated OR adj of around 1.5, but the risk might have been overestimated as we were unable to control for cumulative effects of other occupational mechanical exposures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an update of the The Shoulder JEM, we calibrated the expert-rated arm elevation and repetition estimates against technical measurements to obtain exposure estimates on measurement scales (‘predicted measured job exposures’) as described previously 7 15. The technical measurements were obtained using inclinometry for 36 of the 172 job groups in The Shoulder JEM and comprised 575 whole day measurements 15. We used the predicted measured job exposures in our main analyses (arm elevation >90° (min/day), repetition (median angular velocity, °/s)).…”
We found indications of safe exposure intensities for repetition. Any intensities of force and upper arm elevation >90° above minimal implied an increased risk across 10-year exposure time windows. No independent associations were found for HAV.
“…Exposure–response results on measurement scales would also facilitate future meta-analyses 1. We have recently upgraded the expert-based Shoulder JEM with exposure estimates on measurement scales for upper arm elevation and repetitive shoulder movements,22 and we used the upgraded JEM in the present study.…”
Our findings add to the evidence of an increased risk of surgery for SIS in relation to occupational cumulative mechanical exposures, even when an increased risk in relation to BMI, smoking and diabetes mellitus is taken into account.
“…During recent years, several JEM have been constructed to capture exposure to physical working conditions (14,16). However, only few studies have used mechanical exposure JEM, and most of these assess mechanical exposure in relation to development and consequence of different diseases or pain symptoms (14,(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22).…”
Section: Mechanical Exposures Throughout Life and Labor Market Attachmentioning
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.