2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11771-015-2979-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Upper bound analysis for deep tunnel face with joined failure mechanism of translation and rotation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because the plane strain analysis is more conservative to a three-dimensional one as the beneficial effect of intermediate principal stress is ignored. Besides, as regards plane strain analysis of tunnel face stability, some other failure mechanisms are also available in the literature, e.g., the mechanism based on a discrete technique proposed by Mollon et al [17] and the joined mechanism of translation and rotation proposed by Xu et al [33]. Corresponding to a tunnel face in dry sand (c = 0kPa) with = 18kN/m 3 and D = 10m, the collapse pressures with respect to various friction angles are derived in the light of these three mechanisms, as shown in Table 3.…”
Section: Upper Bound Analysis For Required Supporting Pressurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because the plane strain analysis is more conservative to a three-dimensional one as the beneficial effect of intermediate principal stress is ignored. Besides, as regards plane strain analysis of tunnel face stability, some other failure mechanisms are also available in the literature, e.g., the mechanism based on a discrete technique proposed by Mollon et al [17] and the joined mechanism of translation and rotation proposed by Xu et al [33]. Corresponding to a tunnel face in dry sand (c = 0kPa) with = 18kN/m 3 and D = 10m, the collapse pressures with respect to various friction angles are derived in the light of these three mechanisms, as shown in Table 3.…”
Section: Upper Bound Analysis For Required Supporting Pressurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…When a shield tunnel is located below the river, the stability analysis of the shield tunnel face needs to consider the influence of pore water pressure. The pore water pressure usually is considered an external force [27] and the forces acting upon the wedge at the tunnel face illustrates in Figure 2. A hydrostatic distribution of pore water pressures along the slip surface is assumed.…”
Section: Limit Support Pressurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, Yang et al [4] studied the influence of the inhomogeneity and anisotropy of soil on the ultimate supporting force of a shield tunnel that was excavated in an anisotropic stratum. Consequently, Xu et al [5] proposed a new rotational failure mechanism and used this mechanism in conjunction with a nonlinear failure criterion to compute the theoretical solution of the cabin pressure for tunnel face. Later, Zhang et al [6] constructed threedimensional active and passive failure mechanisms of the tunnel face by investigating the failure features of rock mass in front of the tunnel face.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%