2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.09.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Upper cervical spine injuries: Indications and limits of the conservative management in Halo vest. A systematic review of efficacy and safety

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
51
0
7

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
1
51
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Halo-vest orthoses are associated with high rates of complications, and the risk of mortality in the geriatric population is elevated [15][16][17].…”
Section: Nonoperative Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Halo-vest orthoses are associated with high rates of complications, and the risk of mortality in the geriatric population is elevated [15][16][17].…”
Section: Nonoperative Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most concerning risk is mortality associated with the halo-vest, which may be as high as 20 % in the geriatric population [17]. In younger patients, halo-vest orthoses are considered to be safer [16]. In the geriatric population, halo-vest immobilization is frequently associated with high mortality rates.…”
Section: Nonoperative Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, if we cannot acquire a reduction in the displacement, then osteosynthesis should be adapted. Furthermore, we must also consider potential complications (pin site infection, loss of reduction, pressure sores) of wearing an external orthosis for a prolonged duration of time [16]. Longo et al [16] performed a systematic review focusing on the management of upper cervical spine fractures with a halo fixator, and noted that 96 % of the patients showing non-classifiable fractures of C2 (not odontoid fractures or hangman's fractures) demonstrated bony union.…”
Section: Conservative Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The management options include traction followed by immobilization, semirigid immobilization with cervical collar, rigid immobilization with halo, Minerva, sterno-occipito-mandibular immobilizer, posterior C1-2 fusion and anterior odontoid screw fixation [33]. Longo et al [34] in a systematic review on halo immobilization, concluded that halo immobilization is a safe and effective treatment modality in combination injuries. sufficient in most cases (approximate healing in 12 weeks) [35].…”
Section: Combination Fractures Of Atlas and Axismentioning
confidence: 99%