2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2101.07550
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Upper Dominating Set: Tight Algorithms for Pathwidth and Sub-Exponential Approximation

Abstract: An upper dominating set is a minimal dominating set in a graph. In the Upper Dominating Set problem, the goal is to find an upper dominating set of maximum size. We study the complexity of parameterized algorithms for Upper Dominating Set, as well as its sub-exponential approximation. First, we prove that, under ETH, k-Upper Dominating Set cannot be solved in time)), and in the same time we show under the same complexity assumption that for any constant ratio r and any ε > 0, there is no r-approximation algori… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We improve this lower bound by showing in Theorem 7 that Up-Dom cannot be solved in time f (k) • n o (k) for any computable function f , implying the same result (replacing k by β) for MMHS. We point out that very recently and independently from our work, this improved lower bound for Up-Dom has also been proved by Dublois et al [17].…”
Section: Contribution and Related Worksupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We improve this lower bound by showing in Theorem 7 that Up-Dom cannot be solved in time f (k) • n o (k) for any computable function f , implying the same result (replacing k by β) for MMHS. We point out that very recently and independently from our work, this improved lower bound for Up-Dom has also been proved by Dublois et al [17].…”
Section: Contribution and Related Worksupporting
confidence: 82%
“…for any computable function f : N → N. We also mention that very recently and independently from our work, Theorem 7 has also been proved by Dublois et al [17], by using a reduction quite similar to ours.…”
Section: Theorem 5 B(b(a)) = Asupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The motivation behind this line of research is to provide bounds and a refined analysis of such basic heuristics. Problems that have been considered under this lens are Max Min Dominating Set [8,25], Max Min Vertex Cover [16,56],Max Min Separator [40], Max Min Cut [29], Min Max Knapsack [4,34,38], Max Min Edge Cover [47], Max Min Feedback Vertex Set [24]. Some problems in this area also arise naturally in other forms and have been extensively studied, such as Min Max Matching (also known as Edge Dominating Set [43]) and Grundy Coloring, which can be seen as a Max Min version of Coloring [1,9].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%