1994
DOI: 10.1016/0741-5214(94)90231-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Upper extremity arterial injuries: Experience at the Royal Adelaide Hospital, 1969 to 1991

Abstract: Blunt proximal injuries were usually associated with neurologic, soft tissue, and bony damage, which was responsible for the poor functional outcome. Critical limb ischemia or severe hemorrhage rarely occurred. Complete brachial plexus lesions resulted in uniformly poor outcomes. More distal injuries were associated with fewer nerve and soft tissue injuries, resulting in a more satisfactory outcome.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
4

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
29
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is recognised that significant injury to the brachial plexus is an indication of poor limb related outcomes 4 and indeed in this case, the patient was ultimately found, once extubated, to have a significant plexus injury with associated arm paralysis and complex pain. Eventually, in these types of cases upper limb amputation rates ultimately approach 30%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…However, it is recognised that significant injury to the brachial plexus is an indication of poor limb related outcomes 4 and indeed in this case, the patient was ultimately found, once extubated, to have a significant plexus injury with associated arm paralysis and complex pain. Eventually, in these types of cases upper limb amputation rates ultimately approach 30%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Inclusion criteria were (1) a single vessel injury at the volar forearm with a well-perfused distal limb on presentation, (2) no evidence of hemodynamic instability as measured by consistent systolic blood pressure measurements above 90 mm Hg, and (3) hemostasis achieved within 15 minutes of initiation of manual pressure dressing. Exclusion criteria were (1) a 2-vessel injury, (2) injuries elsewhere in the body that necessitated a trip to the OR within 6 hours of presentation, and (3) follow-up of less than 1 year.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the upper extremity, the axillary and brachial arteries are frequently injured by penetrating mechanisms; and in the lower extremity, the superficial femoral and popliteal arteries are most affected. [31][32][33] The smaller infrageniculate vessels can also be injured. However, if in isolation, these injuries are associated with lower rates of mortality and morbidity than the larger, more-proximal vessels.…”
Section: Extremity Vesselsmentioning
confidence: 99%