2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.coal.2017.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Upper Jurassic–lowermost Cretaceous marine shale source rocks (Farsund Formation), North Sea: Kerogen composition and quality and the adverse effect of oil-based mud contamination on organic geochemical analyses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, the most successful shale gas development is mainly in marine facies shales, such as the Longmaxi formation shale in South China [8,21,30,34], the Marcellus shale [8,21,30,34,36,37], and the Barnett shale in the US [38]. The organic matter type of marine shales is type I or type II [39][40][41]. Additionally, research on shale gas reservoirs has mainly focused on organic shale with type I or type II kerogen [42][43][44].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the most successful shale gas development is mainly in marine facies shales, such as the Longmaxi formation shale in South China [8,21,30,34], the Marcellus shale [8,21,30,34,36,37], and the Barnett shale in the US [38]. The organic matter type of marine shales is type I or type II [39][40][41]. Additionally, research on shale gas reservoirs has mainly focused on organic shale with type I or type II kerogen [42][43][44].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The liquid potential is much less than the worldclass marine shales of the Upper Jurassic -lowermost Cretaceous Farsund Formation, but identifies the coal-bearing Bryne/Lulu strata as the most important secondary source rock in the Danish Central Graben. As an example, the total UEP of the about 850 m thick shale section of the Farsund Formation in the Jude-1 well located in the central part of the Danish Central Graben is ~142 MM boe/km 2 , and the UEO and UEG are ~78 MM boe/km 2 and ~63 MM boe/km 2 respectively (Petersen et al, 2017).…”
Section: Source Rock Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary source rocks in the North Sea are the Upper Jurassic -lowermost Cretaceous marine shales of the Farsund, Mandal and Kimmeridge Clay Formations and equivalents (Damtoft et al, 1992;Cornford, 1998;Ineson et al, 2003;Justwan et al, 2005;Petersen et al, 2010Petersen et al, , 2016Petersen et al, , 2017. In the Danish Central Graben, these world-class source rocks have charged the major chalk fields which account for the vast majority of the daily production of approximately 150,000 brl of oil and 3.9 billion Sm 3 (c. 71,000 brl oil-equivalent) of gas (Danish Energy Agency, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The principal source rocks throughout the entire North Sea region are the Upper Jurassic -lowermost Cretaceous (lower Upper Kimmeridgian -Ryazanian) marine shales which in the Danish Central Graben are constituted by the Farsund Formation ( Fig. 3) (see Thomsen et al (1983), Damtoft et al (1992), , Petersen et al (2013Petersen et al ( , 2017). The Farsund Formation is equivalent to the Kimmeridge Clay and Mandal Formations in the UK and Norwegian Central Grabens and the South Viking Graben (Cornford, 1994(Cornford, , 1998Justwan et al, 2006;Ohm et al, 2006).…”
Section: Ringkøbing -Fyn High Mid North Sea Highmentioning
confidence: 99%