2001
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-246x.2001.01395.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Upper mantle attenuation and velocity structure from measurements of differentialSphases

Abstract: SUMMARY Although much progress has been made in determining the 3‐D distribution of seismic wave velocities in the Earth, substantially less is known about the 3‐D distribution of intrinsic attenuation. In this study variations in attenuation and shear velocity of the Earth's mantle are constrained using measurements of differential traveltime and attenuation. The data are broad‐band displacement SH seismograms filtered to have energy in the period range 8–20 s. The seismograms are obtained from over 600 globa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
43
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(85 reference statements)
3
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most body wave attenuation tomographies are based on variants of Equations (11.17) and (11.18) because they allow us to eliminate the contribution of the potentially uncertain seismic moment by measuring amplitude ratios of different seismic phases (e.g. Reid et al, 2001;Cheng & Kennett, 2002;Kennett & Abdullah, 2011). Early studies of Q in the Earth were primarily based on the decay of free oscillation peaks and long-period surface wave amplitudes (e.g.…”
Section: Description Of Seismic Wave Attenuation Basic Observables Amentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Most body wave attenuation tomographies are based on variants of Equations (11.17) and (11.18) because they allow us to eliminate the contribution of the potentially uncertain seismic moment by measuring amplitude ratios of different seismic phases (e.g. Reid et al, 2001;Cheng & Kennett, 2002;Kennett & Abdullah, 2011). Early studies of Q in the Earth were primarily based on the decay of free oscillation peaks and long-period surface wave amplitudes (e.g.…”
Section: Description Of Seismic Wave Attenuation Basic Observables Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an alternative to surface waves, Reid et al (2001) estimated t * from amplitude ratios of globally recorded S, SS and SSS waves. Also neglecting the effect of focusing, the t * measurements were inverted for a degree-8 model of Q μ in the upper mantle.…”
Section: D Attenuation Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As much as the establishment of global digital networks of seismometers revolutionized global seismology in the past two decades, we believe that the SEM offers unique opportunities for the development in the next decade of a new generation of highquality mantle models and the determination of better earthquake source parameters (40). Ϫ1 dsϪ͐ S ray (␤Q) Ϫ1 ds distribution from (37). Large values of ␦t SSϪS * are often interpreted in terms of strong attenuation, whereas small values reflect weak attenuation.…”
Section: Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these waveforms, many researchers choose SS wave because of its strong energy. For example, SS wave is used to do some researches on the anisotropy in the crust and upper-mantle at its bounce point (Yang and Fischer, 1994;Wolfe and Silver, 1998), global and large scale mantle tomography of S wave (Grand, 2002), the Q value distribution of S wave in the crust and upper-mantle (Bhattacharyya et al, 1996;Reid et al, 2001). At the same time, together with the arrival time difference of SdS on '410'and '660' discontinuities of upper-mantle, SS wave has been used to the researches on topography of global upper-mantle discontinuities and distribution for the thickness of transition zone (Lawrence and Shearer, 2006;Schmerr and Garnero, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%