“…A key assumption underlying the ADE is that the total dispersion coefficient can be described by the sum of effective diffusion and hydrodynamic dispersion, according to the so‐called Fickian analogy [ Bear and Cheng , ]. Limitations of this modeling option have been identified and discussed on the basis of theoretical arguments, numerical simulations, and experimental evidences, which led to the development of alternative formulations encapsulating effective descriptions of non‐Fickian (or anomalous) transport [see, e.g., Haggerty et al ., ; Levy and Berkowitz , ; Berkowitz et al ., ; Zhang et al ., ; Porta et al ., , and references therein]. These approaches encompass very different modeling perspectives, based on both Lagrangian and Eulerian mathematical formulations and can give rise to local and/or nonlocal (integrodifferential) equations.…”