2012
DOI: 10.1029/2011rg000372
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Upscaling sparse ground‐based soil moisture observations for the validation of coarse‐resolution satellite soil moisture products

Abstract: The contrast between the point-scale nature of current ground-based soil moisture instrumentation and the ground resolution (typically >10 2 km 2) of satellites used to retrieve soil moisture poses a significant challenge for the validation of data products from current and upcoming soil moisture satellite missions. Given typical levels of observed spatial variability in soil moisture fields, this mismatch confounds mission validation goals by introducing significant sampling uncertainty in footprint-scale soi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
452
0
13

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 577 publications
(471 citation statements)
references
References 128 publications
(180 reference statements)
6
452
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…This not only suggests the deficiency in modeling or remote sensing of soil moisture but also may indicate the mismatch in spatial scales between in situ observations and the reanalysis or retrieval products that makes the comparison difficult. Point-scale soil moisture has a stronger temporal dynamics [Rodriguez-Iturbe et al, 1995;Crow et al, 2012] than the large-scale (satellite or model) estimation. To testify the sensitivity of the results to spatial scales, we repeat the analysis with resolution coarser than 0.25°.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This not only suggests the deficiency in modeling or remote sensing of soil moisture but also may indicate the mismatch in spatial scales between in situ observations and the reanalysis or retrieval products that makes the comparison difficult. Point-scale soil moisture has a stronger temporal dynamics [Rodriguez-Iturbe et al, 1995;Crow et al, 2012] than the large-scale (satellite or model) estimation. To testify the sensitivity of the results to spatial scales, we repeat the analysis with resolution coarser than 0.25°.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While in-situ probes provide continuous soil moisture measurements with a satisfactory level of accuracy, it has been widely admitted that these point measurements lack representativeness of regional soil water conditions [117]. Remote sensing techniques provide the opportunity to obtain spatial information on land surface soil moisture, compensating for the shortage of in-situ measuring techniques.…”
Section: Overview Of Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The soil properties and processes at this scale can however differ from those at the LSM grid cell sizes, which are often as large as hundreds to tens of thousands of square kilometres (Pitman, 2003). Due to the different governing processes, upscaling the soil hydraulic properties from soil core scale to field scale is nontrivial (Vinnikov et al, 1996;Crow et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%