1990
DOI: 10.1130/0091-7613(1990)018<0054:ufotca>2.3.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Upslope flow of turbidity currents: A comparison among field observations, theory, and laboratory models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
53
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a stratigraphic evolution fits well with the first two stages of the 'fill and spill' depositional model (e.g., Sinclair and Tomasso, 2002) in that as the height of the confining topography is reduced because of sediment infilling the basin, an increasing amount of fine grained sediments escape the basin so that the net/gross increases stratigraphically upwards (see also Amy et al, 2007 andBrunt et al, 2004) Figs 8 and 9). These observations imply that stripping of mud not only increased gradually as a result of basin infill, but was enhanced in the event of exceptionally large turbidity currents (Muck and Underwood, 1990;Brunt et al, 2004;Amy et al, 2007) and could take place even during the earliest deposition in the Castagnola Basin; sandstone thicknesses from the same unit are in agreement with the model of Sinclair and Cowie (2003) for ponded turbidites. In addition, if the range of inbound flows remains the same throughout deposition of the studied section, the lack of a thick-bedded tail in the mud cap populations of Unit 2 and 3 entails a dramatic increase of stripping of the mud which is paralleled with a significant departure from the bed thickness statistical distribution of the older Unit 1.…”
Section: Transition From Ponded To Flow-stripping-dominated Conditionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Such a stratigraphic evolution fits well with the first two stages of the 'fill and spill' depositional model (e.g., Sinclair and Tomasso, 2002) in that as the height of the confining topography is reduced because of sediment infilling the basin, an increasing amount of fine grained sediments escape the basin so that the net/gross increases stratigraphically upwards (see also Amy et al, 2007 andBrunt et al, 2004) Figs 8 and 9). These observations imply that stripping of mud not only increased gradually as a result of basin infill, but was enhanced in the event of exceptionally large turbidity currents (Muck and Underwood, 1990;Brunt et al, 2004;Amy et al, 2007) and could take place even during the earliest deposition in the Castagnola Basin; sandstone thicknesses from the same unit are in agreement with the model of Sinclair and Cowie (2003) for ponded turbidites. In addition, if the range of inbound flows remains the same throughout deposition of the studied section, the lack of a thick-bedded tail in the mud cap populations of Unit 2 and 3 entails a dramatic increase of stripping of the mud which is paralleled with a significant departure from the bed thickness statistical distribution of the older Unit 1.…”
Section: Transition From Ponded To Flow-stripping-dominated Conditionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…flow thickness, internal stratification in sediment concentration and grain size, velocity, duration and total discharge) and the height of the enclosing topography (Muck and Underwood 1990;Alexander and Morris 1994;Kneller and McCaffrey 1999). These controlling factors may be time-variant due to changes in sedimentary input and modifications of seafloor bathymetry, including basin infill (Prather et al 1998;Winker and Booth 2000;Sinclair and Tomasso 2002;Felletti and Bersezio 2010;Sylvester et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The volcanic sandstones were not expected at the top of the knoll, and they probably shared a common Izu-Bonin source with Unit II at Site C0011. Their existence seemingly requires upslope transfer by turbidity currents (Muck and Underwood, 1990) and/or post-depositional uplift of the basement high. Seismic data show that the facies thins toward the basement high but drapes over the crest and continues onto the seaward-facing flank (Fig.…”
Section: Principal Results From Site C0011mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basement architecture clearly modulated sedimentation rates throughout the history of the Shikoku Basin, but relief on Kashinosaki Knoll was never high enough to completely prevent the transport and deposition of sandy detritus atop the crest. This comes as something of a surprise, although comparable deposits from thick turbidity currents and/or upslope flow of gravity flows have been documented elsewhere (Muck and Underwood, 1990). This discovery is important because the basement highs of the Shikoku Basin could act as asperities once they reach seismogenic depths along the plate interface (Cloos, 1992;Bilek, 2007).…”
Section: History Of Sedimentation and Fluidsmentioning
confidence: 99%