2013
DOI: 10.5194/hessd-10-14535-2013
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Upstream to downstream: a multiple-assessment-point approach for targeting non-point-source priority management areas at large watershed scale

Abstract: Abstract. The identification of priority management areas (PMAs) is essential for the control of non-point source (NPS) pollution, especially for a large-scale watershed. However, previous studies have typically focused on small-scale catchments adjacent to specific assessment points; thus, the interactions between multiple river points remain poorly understood. In this study, a multiple-assessment-point PMA (MAP-PMA) framework was proposed by integrating the upstream sources and the downstream transport aspec… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The final Pareto-optimality front indicated average reductions of N and P loads from 43.74%–93.38% and 49.74%–88.83%, respectively. In our previous studies 19 20 , the average concentrations of TN and TP at the Wuxi station were quantified as 0.82 and 0.13 mg/l, respectively, indicating a further requirement of 39.02% and 23.07% load reductions from the baseline. Figure 2 indicates that the optimal watershed-scale BMP configurations would be disproportionate to the intended objective of maintaining the water quality provisioning services in the TGRA.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The final Pareto-optimality front indicated average reductions of N and P loads from 43.74%–93.38% and 49.74%–88.83%, respectively. In our previous studies 19 20 , the average concentrations of TN and TP at the Wuxi station were quantified as 0.82 and 0.13 mg/l, respectively, indicating a further requirement of 39.02% and 23.07% load reductions from the baseline. Figure 2 indicates that the optimal watershed-scale BMP configurations would be disproportionate to the intended objective of maintaining the water quality provisioning services in the TGRA.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…According to the results from previous studies, the downstream water quality could meet the concentration standard of the corresponding water function areas if the water quality in the Wuxi hydrologic station was in a critical state of health with a 100% water quality compliance rate (Chen et al, 2014b). Thus, the Wuxi hydrologic station was chosen as the assessment point to evaluate the objective functions for the TN load, TP load and the total cost of the set of BMPs.…”
Section: Multi-objective Optimization Results Based On Preference Solmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The preferred solution adjusts the types and number of BMPs locally. A tiny change in decision makers' preferences will influence the watershed management programs in the highly polluted areas identified by Chen et al (2014b).…”
Section: The Comparison Between the Preference-based And Original Nsgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It might be explained that although the major industries of these industrial estates were similar, the level of heavy metal contamination can be different depending on numbers of factories, pollution control measures, and environmental management effectiveness. In addition, since Bangpa-in district is located downstream of Uthai District, heavy metal input from multiple sources upstream, including agriculture, factories, and communities along the river, can contribute higher heavy metal contamination to the downstream area [ 32 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%