2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.06.070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uptake and timing of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy among patients with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are few carriers who received RRSO by the age of 40 according to the guidelines. Smith et al [ 22 ] reported that the most common reason for the delay in RRSO was delayed identification of BRCA mutation, thus timely genetic testing for eligible patients can increase appropriately timed RRSO for prevention of OC and reduction of mortality in BRCA mutation carriers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are few carriers who received RRSO by the age of 40 according to the guidelines. Smith et al [ 22 ] reported that the most common reason for the delay in RRSO was delayed identification of BRCA mutation, thus timely genetic testing for eligible patients can increase appropriately timed RRSO for prevention of OC and reduction of mortality in BRCA mutation carriers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many respondents declared to have undergone RRSO (55.5%) and prophylactic double mastectomy (55.9%), a slightly higher percentage than the 38% and 40% reported in the literature [ 11 , 23 ]. Aside from the full reimbursement of the procedure by the public healthcare system in Italy, this could also be explained by the fact that they belong to patients’ associations, a network of mostly more knowledgeable and self-aware women.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Indeed, there is evidence in the general population that mortality is significantly higher in women who had received RRSO before the age of 45 and did not undergo HRT (hazard ratio 1.67 (95% CI 1.16–2.40), p = 0.006) [ 10 ]. In BRCA carriers, RRSO has been shown to decrease gynecologic cancer-specific, as well as overall, mortality [ 11 ], but the short- and long-term adverse effects of premature menopause still remain. A recent meta-analysis did not find increased cancer risk linked to the use of HRT in healthy carriers, which is not contraindicated in this specific population [ 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The women in Period B were not young enough to match the appropriate age derived from NCCN guidelines [6]. It was reported that women who underwent delayed RRSO were signi cantly older at the time of genetic testing than those who underwent timely RRSO [15]. To promote genetic testing for unaffected carriers, its coverage by the national insurance system for unaffected individuals is expected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%