1981
DOI: 10.1080/01904168109362852
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uptake and toxicity of nickel and other metals in crops grown on soil contaminated by a nickel refinery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The concentration of Ni in the 0-5 cm layer of untilled muck soil ranged from 800 to over 6000 mg kg -1 (Frank et al 1982). Concentrations of metals in the subsurface (5-10 cm) layer were 50 to 70% lower than in the surface layer, supporting the conclusion of aerosol deposition of most of the soil Ni (Temple and Bisessar 1981). Vegetable crops grown on a nearby muck soil showed visual symptoms of Ni phytotoxicity, and yields of several Nisensitive vegetable crops were substantially reduced, apparently due to the presence of the soil contaminants (Frank et al 1982).…”
supporting
confidence: 48%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The concentration of Ni in the 0-5 cm layer of untilled muck soil ranged from 800 to over 6000 mg kg -1 (Frank et al 1982). Concentrations of metals in the subsurface (5-10 cm) layer were 50 to 70% lower than in the surface layer, supporting the conclusion of aerosol deposition of most of the soil Ni (Temple and Bisessar 1981). Vegetable crops grown on a nearby muck soil showed visual symptoms of Ni phytotoxicity, and yields of several Nisensitive vegetable crops were substantially reduced, apparently due to the presence of the soil contaminants (Frank et al 1982).…”
supporting
confidence: 48%
“…Soil and plant contamination by the emissions from a nickel refinery at Port Colborne, Ontario, Canada, has been described by Temple and Bisessar (1981), Frank et al (1982), Bisessar (1989) and McIlveen and Negusanti (1994). Nickel was the major contaminant emitted by the refinery, although the soils were also contaminated with Co and Cu, which has been added to improve fertility of the muck soil.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Temple and Bisessar (1981) found that for a muck soil from Port Colborne, growth of onion, potato, celery, cabbage and lettuce was reduced for some plant parts at soil Ni concentrations in the range of 2000 to 3000 mg kg (1 . Chaney (2000, 2004) identified severe phytotoxicity of numerous agronomic species in clay soil from Port Colborne with total soil Ni concentrations of 2900 mg kg…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plants in the impacted area showed typical toxicity symptoms. Further field and greenhouse pot experiments, conducted using the Ni-contaminated muck soils, displayed distinct Ni-toxicity foliar symptoms with stunting, cupping and foliar necrosis in celery, beets, cabbage, lettuce and radish, reducing the yield of the tested plants by 28-100 % compared with their counterparts grown in comparable uncontaminated soils [77][78][79]. Liming these Ni-contaminated soils, which raised their pH from 5.1-5.9 to at least 6.9, showed that soilextractable Ni could be reduced and Ni toxicity to celery, wheat, oat and redbeet crops mitigated [77,80].…”
Section: Nickelmentioning
confidence: 99%