2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00128-019-02746-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uptake Prediction of Ten Heavy Metals by Eruca sativa Mill. Cultivated in Soils Amended with Sewage Sludge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since there is not much literature available relating to the establishment of regression models specifically for the absorption of metals by A. esculentus grown in media combined with varying sewage sludge concentrations, the obtained data were compared with studies that evaluated similar concepts using regression models pertaining to alternative crops. When judged against the tissues of A. esculentus in which Cd variability was 77.7-92.5%, Cd variabilities within the plant components for cucumber [1], barley [43], kidney bean [47], garden pea [48], Corchorus olitorius [49], Eruca sativa [50], and spinach [51] were 49-76%, 45-88%, 44-61%, 25-67%, 69-75%, 49-81%, and 83-88%, respectively. Bešter et al [44] used models to measure the impact of Cd in tomato and endive, which exhibited R 2 values of 41% and 90%, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since there is not much literature available relating to the establishment of regression models specifically for the absorption of metals by A. esculentus grown in media combined with varying sewage sludge concentrations, the obtained data were compared with studies that evaluated similar concepts using regression models pertaining to alternative crops. When judged against the tissues of A. esculentus in which Cd variability was 77.7-92.5%, Cd variabilities within the plant components for cucumber [1], barley [43], kidney bean [47], garden pea [48], Corchorus olitorius [49], Eruca sativa [50], and spinach [51] were 49-76%, 45-88%, 44-61%, 25-67%, 69-75%, 49-81%, and 83-88%, respectively. Bešter et al [44] used models to measure the impact of Cd in tomato and endive, which exhibited R 2 values of 41% and 90%, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is therefore no content-dependent absorption reference for all metallic elements (Singh and Agrawal 2010). Comparable data for Co and Cd were published with respect to Corchorus olitorius (Eid et al 2020a) and Eruca sativa (Eid et al 2020b) grown in field soil combined with SS and Typha domingensis grown under natural conditions (Eid et al 2020c).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regression models are mathematical approaches that predict the concentrations of HMs in plants using some soil variables such as soil HMs, pH, and OM (Chaudri et al, 2007; Eid, Alrumman, Farahat, et al, 2018; Eid, Alrumman, Galal, et al, 2018, 2019; Eid, Shaltout, Abdallah, et al, 2019; Eid, Shaltout, Alamri, et al, 2019; Waegeneers et al, 2011). Data presented here suggested that the calculated prediction models are highly performed for all the estimated HMs in shoots and roots of C. olitorius , based on the parameters that evaluate the high performance of the models ( R 2 , ME, MNAE, and t ‐values).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prediction models for the uptake of HMs by C. olitorius are comparable to those produced for some crop plants. For example, the determination coefficient ( R 2 ) for Cd in cucumber had a range of 49%–76% (Eid, Alrumman, Farahat, et al, 2018), in spinach had a range of 83%–88% (Eid, Alrumman, Galal, et al, 2018), in Eruca sativa had a range of 49%–81% (Eid, Shaltout, Abdallah, et al, 2019), in garden pea had a range of 25% – 87% (Eid, Shaltout, Alamri, et al, 2019), while it had a range of 69%–75% for C. olitorius in the current study. In this regard, Bešter et al (2013) found that R 2 values of the Cd models in some selected vegetables ranged from 41% for tomato to 90% for endive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation