Upward Feedback: Exploring Learner Perspectives on Giving Feedback to their Teachers

Abstract

Introduction: Feedback from learners is known to be an important motivator for medical teachers, but it can be de-motivating if delivered poorly, leaving teachers frustrated and uncertain. Research has identified challenges learners face in providing upward feedback, but has not explored how challenges influence learners’ goals and approaches to giving feedback. This study explored learner perspectives on providing feedback to teachers to advance understanding of how to optimize upward feedback quality. Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with 16 learners from the MD program at the University of British Columbia. Applying an interpretive description methodology, interviews continued until data sufficiency was achieved. Iterative analysis accounted for general trends across seniority, site of training, age and gender as well as individual variations. Findings: Learners articulated well-intentioned goals in relation to upward feedback (e.g., to encourage effective teaching practices). However, conflicting priorities such as protecting one’s image created tensions leading to feedback that was discordant with teaching quality. Several factors, including the number of feedback requests learners face and whether learners think their feedback is meaningful mediated the extent to which upward feedback goals or competing goals were enacted. Discussion: Our findings offer a nuanced understanding of the complexities that influence learners’ approaches to upward feedback when challenges arise. In particular, goal conflicts make it difficult for learners to contribute to teacher support through upward feedback. Efforts to encourage the quality of upward feedback should begin with reducing competition between goals by addressing factors that mediate goal prioritization.

Enhancing Faculty Development Through Compiled Verbal Feedback on Clinical Teaching From Trainees

“… 8 , 9 , 10 Wisener et al described goals of learners’ feedback to faculty, including complexities and barriers to delivery of effective feedback. 11 Barriers that they identified included burden of surveys, the importance of protecting self‐image, a desire to provide helpful and meaningful feedback to faculty, and the wish to avoid hurting faculty members’ feelings.…”

“…Consistent with the study by Wisener et al, our study identified two likely contributing factors to the overall perception by faculty and FITs that online evaluations were a poor mechanism for faculty feedback. 11 First, FITs reported substantial time burden of online evaluations, likely allowing for less reflection and thoughtfulness in completing the evaluations. Second, many FITs expressed concerns regarding confidentiality with online evaluations.…”

Development of natural sciences e-modules based on android with a science, environment, technology, and society approach in the earth structure chapter

“…In addition, students are often expected to learn certain content in a fixed time and sometimes it is not aligned with their learning style. This can result in students feeling overwhelmed so that their learning outcomes are not optimal [10]. To overcome this problem, educators can combine several approaches to student-centered learning and active learning.…”