1991
DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.83.3.845
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Upward shift of the lower range of coronary flow autoregulation in hypertensive patients with hypertrophy of the left ventricle.

Abstract: Background. At any given perfusion pressure, coronary reserve is expressed by the difference between autoregulated and maximally vasodilated flow. In hypertension the raised coronary resistance reduces the steepness of the pressure-flow relationship at maximal vasodilatation. In the presence of cardiac hypertrophy the line of autoregulated flow becomes higher. For these reasons coronary reserve is reduced and the point at which baseline flow approaches the maximal achievable flow might be shifted to a higher p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
81
0
3

Year Published

1998
1998
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 184 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
81
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the increased standard deviation shown for E-wave and E/A values in the HP2 group points to the fact that some heterogeneity remained and could, at least in part, justify the reduction in coronary reserve found in this group. The influence of coronary perfusion pressure 37 seems to be unlikely, since diastolic blood pressures taken during either baseline or maximal coronary flow measurements were comparable between both hypertensive groups. The alleged interference of the type of antihypertensive therapy with CFVR, particularly angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor drugs, 38,39 seems unlikely as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…However, the increased standard deviation shown for E-wave and E/A values in the HP2 group points to the fact that some heterogeneity remained and could, at least in part, justify the reduction in coronary reserve found in this group. The influence of coronary perfusion pressure 37 seems to be unlikely, since diastolic blood pressures taken during either baseline or maximal coronary flow measurements were comparable between both hypertensive groups. The alleged interference of the type of antihypertensive therapy with CFVR, particularly angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor drugs, 38,39 seems unlikely as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Moreover, in hypertensive patients also coronary autoregulation in the subendocardium is shifted toward higher pressure, probably owing to Journal of Human Hypertension left ventricular hypertrophy and functional and structural alterations in the small coronary vessels. 3,5,18,19 The relationship between CBF and MAP has been established by invasive BP measurements. 1,20 In general, the non-invasive approach tends, when compared with the invasive approach, to underestimate SBP and overestimate DBP, 21 but the differences are small.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28 Although the mechanisms responsible for the increased danger are not completely defined, they include the modified response to adrenergic stimulation, sodium and calcium intracellular metabolism changes, coronary flow and reserve reduction, increased arrhythmiogenesis and decrease of the ventricular fibrillation threshold, development of congestive heart failure in parallel to the progressive degeneration of myocytes and their replacement by connective tissue. 29 So, a basic target of anti-hypertensive therapy is the regression of LV hypertrophy. This is achieved by the use of different anti-hypertensive drugs and, at least on a short-term basis, it seems to be independent of BP levels and the degree of cardiac wall hypertrophy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%