Replacement of Renal Function by Dialysis 1979
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-9327-3_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uraemic Toxins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1979
1979
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 240 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, it has as yet not been established which solute(s) cause(s) the various systemic disturbances underlying uremia [1][2][3]. There fore, it has not been possible to develop selective methods of blood purification to remove such solutes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, it has as yet not been established which solute(s) cause(s) the various systemic disturbances underlying uremia [1][2][3]. There fore, it has not been possible to develop selective methods of blood purification to remove such solutes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the high concentrations of urea can be reduced either by dietary restriction of protein or by improving renal func tion, symptoms usually improve [6]. Despite the relative ly mild toxicity of urea and its poor correlation with renal function, the association of rising serum urea levels with symptoms of uremia and improvement in symptoms as urea falls, suggests that urea is a reasonable marker for accumulated nitrogenous toxins [7], The practice of fol lowing the BUN and serum creatinine that has evolved from several decades of experience with patients prior to their death from uremia has naturally extended into the dialysis era.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The poor correlation between dialysis effect and serum creatinine levels was recognized by early quan tifiers of dialysis, so more attention has been focused on control of the urea [10,11]. This seemed appropriate for two reasons: (1) urea is easily dialyzed and is therefore a sensitive indicator of the dialysis effect, and (2) urea reflects total nonprotein nitrogen levels in the body among which are significant uremic toxins [7,12], Control of urea nitrogen that was limited to dietary pro tein restriction in the predialysis era was extended to include dialysis. However, it soon became apparent that neither the effect of dialysis nor the outcome correlated well with serum urea levels.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%