Encyclopedia of Scientific Dating Methods 2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-6326-5_15-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uranium-Lead, Metamorphic Rocks

Abstract: Definition: The word metamorphism derives from the Greek word "metamorphosis," meaning change of form. Metamorphism is the process by which the mineralogy of rocks is changed as the result of pressure and temperature according to their composition and with the aid of fluid and deformation. Metamorphism is mainly concerned with the changes that take place when rocks are in the solid state, even though melt can be one of the phases present.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is especially true given the potential of the K‐Ar ( 40 Ar/ 39 Ar) system in mica to be perturbed by post‐kinematic, ephemeral tectono‐thermal events (Hacker & Wang, 1995; Ratschbacher et al., 2000). The U–Pb system, in contrast, is relatively stable under medium‐ to low‐grade metamorphic conditions for most minerals (R. Parrish, 2014; Rubatto, 2013; Yakymchuk et al., 2017). In this regard, the U–Pb geochronology of monazite, titanite, apatite and rutile may be more effective than the 40 Ar/ 39 Ar systems for dating shear deformation under amphibolite‐ to greenschist‐facies metamorphic conditions (Chew & Spikings, 2015; Kohn, 2017; R. R. Parrish, 1990; Zack & Kooijman, 2017), especially when fluid mediated (re)crystallization occurs (e.g., Ribeiro et al., 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is especially true given the potential of the K‐Ar ( 40 Ar/ 39 Ar) system in mica to be perturbed by post‐kinematic, ephemeral tectono‐thermal events (Hacker & Wang, 1995; Ratschbacher et al., 2000). The U–Pb system, in contrast, is relatively stable under medium‐ to low‐grade metamorphic conditions for most minerals (R. Parrish, 2014; Rubatto, 2013; Yakymchuk et al., 2017). In this regard, the U–Pb geochronology of monazite, titanite, apatite and rutile may be more effective than the 40 Ar/ 39 Ar systems for dating shear deformation under amphibolite‐ to greenschist‐facies metamorphic conditions (Chew & Spikings, 2015; Kohn, 2017; R. R. Parrish, 1990; Zack & Kooijman, 2017), especially when fluid mediated (re)crystallization occurs (e.g., Ribeiro et al., 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%