2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2006.08.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uranyl sorption species at low coverage on Al-hydroxide: TRLFS and XAFS studies

Abstract: International audienceDetailed understanding of the respective roles of solution and surface parameters on the reactions at uranyl solution/Al-(hydr)oxide interfaces is crucial to model accurately the behaviour of U in nature. We report studies on the effects of the initial aqueous uranyl speciation in moderately acidic solutions, e.g. of mononuclear, polynuclear uranyl species and/or (potential) U(VI) colloids, on the sorption of U by large surface areas of amorphous Al-hydroxide. Investigations by Extended X… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
47
1
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(78 reference statements)
7
47
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…4 with their shell-by-shell fitting results in Table 2. EX-AFS fit results for sample U-2-0.1-pH4 include a split equatorial oxygen shell with $3.7 O eq at $2.34 Å and $2.4 O eq at $2.48 Å , similar to the EXAFS results from previous work on uranyl sorption on alumina (e.g., Sylwester et al, 2000;Froideval et al, 2006), and can be attributed to the formation of an inner-sphere sorption complex. In addition to a similar split O eq shell (fit as $2.3 O eq at $2.36 and $1.5 O eq at $2.51 Å ), sample U-10-1-pH9 can also be fit with $1.7 U at $3.91 Å , suggesting the formation of uranyl polymeric species or (oxy)hydroxide precipitates at this higher concentration and pH (Sylwester et al, 2000;Froideval et al, 2006).…”
Section: Ms and As Insupporting
confidence: 83%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…4 with their shell-by-shell fitting results in Table 2. EX-AFS fit results for sample U-2-0.1-pH4 include a split equatorial oxygen shell with $3.7 O eq at $2.34 Å and $2.4 O eq at $2.48 Å , similar to the EXAFS results from previous work on uranyl sorption on alumina (e.g., Sylwester et al, 2000;Froideval et al, 2006), and can be attributed to the formation of an inner-sphere sorption complex. In addition to a similar split O eq shell (fit as $2.3 O eq at $2.36 and $1.5 O eq at $2.51 Å ), sample U-10-1-pH9 can also be fit with $1.7 U at $3.91 Å , suggesting the formation of uranyl polymeric species or (oxy)hydroxide precipitates at this higher concentration and pH (Sylwester et al, 2000;Froideval et al, 2006).…”
Section: Ms and As Insupporting
confidence: 83%
“…U EXAFS of sample cosp-2-0.4-0.2-pH6 shows a uniform O eq distance as well as As backscattering at $3.7 Å , suggesting uranyl arsenate precipitates as the predominant species, consistent with corresponding As EXAFS results. Previous studies of uranyl sorption on alumina at this pH range suggest the formation of a mononuclear inner-sphere sorption complex and possibly minor amounts of surface-sorbed or precipitated polynuclear uranyl species depending on solution concentrations (Sylwester et al, 2000;Froideval et al, 2006). Although no significant sorption enhancement was observed, our results reveal possible enhanced structural stability because of the formation of uranyl arsenate precipitates at this pH range, which are more stable and less susceptible to desorption and remobilization than surface-sorbed uranyl species.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 38%
See 3 more Smart Citations