2001
DOI: 10.1006/jcis.2001.7602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uranyl Surface Speciation on Silica Particles Studied by Time-Resolved Laser-Induced Fluorescence Spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
121
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
7
121
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Differences in U(VI) adsorption extent to quartz and ferrihydrite as compared to the results of Fox et al (2006) were noted that result from solid-liquid ratio effects. Direct comparisons are not easily made with other previous studies of U(VI) adsorption to smectites Morris et al, 1994;McKinley et al, 1995;Turner et al, 1996;Sylwester et al, 2000;Chisholm-Brause et al, 2001;Hennig et al, 2002;Chisholm-Brause et al, 2004;Kowal-Fouchard et al, 2004;Catalano and Brown, 2005) and quartz or amorphous silica (Glinka et al, 1997;Arnold et al, 1998;Gabriel et al, 2001;Froideval et al, 2003) because of differences in solution pH, U(VI) concentration, solid-to-liquid ratio, and carbonate concentration as well as the procedure of mineral preparation. U(VI) affinity varied by more than two orders of magnitude for the phyllosilicates with the highest K d values observed for chlorites, particularly the ones rich in Mg but poor in Fe (Table 3).…”
Section: U(vi) Adsorption Affinity On Reference Mineralsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Differences in U(VI) adsorption extent to quartz and ferrihydrite as compared to the results of Fox et al (2006) were noted that result from solid-liquid ratio effects. Direct comparisons are not easily made with other previous studies of U(VI) adsorption to smectites Morris et al, 1994;McKinley et al, 1995;Turner et al, 1996;Sylwester et al, 2000;Chisholm-Brause et al, 2001;Hennig et al, 2002;Chisholm-Brause et al, 2004;Kowal-Fouchard et al, 2004;Catalano and Brown, 2005) and quartz or amorphous silica (Glinka et al, 1997;Arnold et al, 1998;Gabriel et al, 2001;Froideval et al, 2003) because of differences in solution pH, U(VI) concentration, solid-to-liquid ratio, and carbonate concentration as well as the procedure of mineral preparation. U(VI) affinity varied by more than two orders of magnitude for the phyllosilicates with the highest K d values observed for chlorites, particularly the ones rich in Mg but poor in Fe (Table 3).…”
Section: U(vi) Adsorption Affinity On Reference Mineralsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…U(VI) adsorption increased as a function of pH and reached nearly 100% at pH 7 even in the presence of 5 Â 10 À4 mol L À1 fluoride. Similarly, Gabriel et al (2001) …”
Section: Mineralogical Association Of U(vi) In Spp1 Gwfmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, a more likely explanation of the pH effect on the absorption and emission of uranyl in solution is the driving of chemical reactions. Experimentally, it is found that in acidic solutions the uranyl radical tends to be free, and in basic solutions the uranyl radical tends to be bound to carbonates or other ligands (Gabriel, 2001).…”
Section: Solvation Structurementioning
confidence: 99%