2018
DOI: 10.5572/ajae.2018.12.2.139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Urban Air Quality Model Inter-Comparison Study (UMICS) for Improvement of PM2.5 Simulation in Greater Tokyo Area of Japan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, as observed for the EC, the negative biases of OC for the Tokyo area were larger than those for western Japan. However, the negative biases of all participant CTMs have been clearly moderated compared with the UMICS cases [11,12]. Among the models, M02, M03, and M11 predicted relatively higher OC levels and overestimated the summer OC concentrations.…”
Section: Simulated Daily Concentrations Of Pm 25 Components and Totamentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Additionally, as observed for the EC, the negative biases of OC for the Tokyo area were larger than those for western Japan. However, the negative biases of all participant CTMs have been clearly moderated compared with the UMICS cases [11,12]. Among the models, M02, M03, and M11 predicted relatively higher OC levels and overestimated the summer OC concentrations.…”
Section: Simulated Daily Concentrations Of Pm 25 Components and Totamentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In winter, most models reproduced day-to-day changes in both domains but tended to underestimate elevated NO 3 − levels, with ensemble mean biases of −0.89 µg/m 3 (NMB: −18.9%) and −2.36 µg/m 3 (NMB: −42.8%). A previous model inter-comparison study for the Tokyo metropolitan area, UMICS, concluded that the participant models overestimated NO 3 − levels in both summer and winter [11,12], although available observations included only one winter and three summer stations. In our validations, most models produced higher NO 3 − levels in spring and summer, lower NO 3 − levels in winter, and moderate NO 3 − levels in autumn, compared with accumulated observation data for d03 and d04.…”
Section: Simulated Daily Concentrations Of Pm 25 Components and Totamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, as discussed in the previous subsection, high deposition velocity of fine NO − 3 due to evaporation in the forest (up to 40 times the above values) may effectively remove nitrate aerosols from the atmosphere over the forest and leeward. If the aerosol dynamics and gas-particle conversion processes can be incorporated into the dry deposition scheme in chemical transport models, we could improve upon or even eliminate prior studies' overestimates of the surface concentration of fine NO − 3 (Kajino et al, 2013;Shimadera et al, 2014Shimadera et al, , 2018Morino et al, 2015;Sakurai et al, 2015). Hicks et al (2016) found that in modeling deposition velocities of aerosols, the 340 greatest uncertainty manifests in the range 0.1 -1.0 µm.…”
Section: Influencing the Chemical Transport Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Related to SO 4 2− production, this inventory database also contains information about primary fine-mode sulfate emissions. The verification of primary and secondary air pollutants has been reported [20][21][22]; however, to our knowledge, trace elements in Japan have not been fully evaluated. Sulfuric gas emissions were set as zero in the first phase of J-STREAM due to the lack of information.…”
Section: Overview Of Modeled So 4 2− Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%