1971
DOI: 10.1080/04353684.1971.11879355
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Urban Allometric Growth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
51
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
5
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Equation (2), the coefficient a 2 is called the proportionality coefficient, a measure of space standard (Nordbeck 1971), because by rearranging, Equation (2) becomes a 2 ϭ A/P b 2 , which is a ratio between land area and population size and is related to the mean population density of an urban area. In other words, the space standard is the mean reciprocal population density.…”
Section: Development Of Urban-indicators Estimation Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Equation (2), the coefficient a 2 is called the proportionality coefficient, a measure of space standard (Nordbeck 1971), because by rearranging, Equation (2) becomes a 2 ϭ A/P b 2 , which is a ratio between land area and population size and is related to the mean population density of an urban area. In other words, the space standard is the mean reciprocal population density.…”
Section: Development Of Urban-indicators Estimation Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, the space standard is the mean reciprocal population density. The exponent b 2 , which is called the scaling factor in biol-ogy, is the most important, because it describes how the land area A in Equation (2) is scaled to the population size P. According to Nordbeck (1971), the relationship in Equation 2 displays the surface-volume constraints, based on the consideration that area has two dimensions while population has three (or a volume). As a result, the value of the exponent b should be 2/3, or 0.67.…”
Section: Development Of Urban-indicators Estimation Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, it was employed to describe the relationship between a system of cities and the largest city within the urban system (Beckmann, 1958;Carroll, 1982). From then on, a large number of works were devoted to exploring the scaling relationships between urban area and population, indicating size and shape in the growth of human communities (Batty and Longley, 1994;Chen, 2010;Lee, 1972;Lo and Welch, 1977;Longley, 1991;Nordbeck, 1971;Tobler, 1969). The empirical studies put the allometric analyses of cities in a dilemma of dimension .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The radial dimension based on concentric circles is to a growing monofractal what capacity dimension is to growing multifractals, while the fractal dimension based on variable urban boundaris is to a growing monofractal what correlation dimension is to growing multifractals. In fact, two kinds of allometric scaling relations between city size and shape have been researched for a long time (Batty and Longley, 1994;Bettencourt, 2013;Lee, 1989;Lo, 2002;Lo and Welch, 1977;Nordbeck, 1971). One is the longitudinal allometry of urban growth, which can be studied using time series data, and the other is the transversal allometry, or cross-sectional allometry, of urban systems, which can be studied using the rank-size series data (Chen, 2014a;Pumain and Moriconi-Ebrard, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The process of self-organizing evolution of cities follows the law of allometric scaling, which has been researched by many scientists (Arcaute et al, 2005;Batty, 2008;Batty, 2013;Batty and Longley, 1994;Bettencourt, 2013;Bettencourt et al, 2007;Chen, 2014a;Chen and Zhou, 2008;Louf and Barthelemy, 2014a;Louf and Barthelemy, 2014b;West, 2017;Luo and Chen, 2014). Allometric modeling can be utilized to describe the scaling relations between urban and rural population (Chen, 2014b;Naroll and Bertalanffy, 1956), relations between an urban system and its central city (Beckmann, 1958;Zhou, 1995), relations between urban area and population size (Batty and Longley, 1994;Lee, 1989;Lo and Welch, 1977;Nordbeck, 1971), relations between urban area and boundary (Batty and Longley, 1994;Chen, 2013), relations between different cities of an urban system (Chen and Jiang, 2009), scaling of building geometries Gould, 1971), and so on. Among all these models, the most frequent one is the urban area-population allometry, which indicates the scaling relation between size and shape in the growth of human communities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%