2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Urban building energy modeling – A review of a nascent field

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
351
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 742 publications
(358 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
351
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…With respect to various applications in urban sustainability, massing cityscapes (i.e., 3D buildings in low LOD) can be used for urban design and urban planning [45]. For solar radiation estimation in urban environments, instead of being limited by 2D surfaces (e.g., flat roof surfaces), the introduction of the 3DCM, coupled with its ability to provide data at the appropriate LOD, enabled the development of a new 3D solar radiation model that considers both the building roofs and walls [46].…”
Section: Discussion Of Studies Of Urban Issues Underpinned By Simplifmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With respect to various applications in urban sustainability, massing cityscapes (i.e., 3D buildings in low LOD) can be used for urban design and urban planning [45]. For solar radiation estimation in urban environments, instead of being limited by 2D surfaces (e.g., flat roof surfaces), the introduction of the 3DCM, coupled with its ability to provide data at the appropriate LOD, enabled the development of a new 3D solar radiation model that considers both the building roofs and walls [46].…”
Section: Discussion Of Studies Of Urban Issues Underpinned By Simplifmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finer classification is desired but under the penalty of additional computational cost. Reinhart and Cerezo Davila (2016) indicated that the building energy prediction might be largely different from measured data due to the uncertainties associated with the definition of archetypes. In the bottom-up engineering building stock model, the errors at the individual building level are higher than at the aggregate level since the inaccuracies at individual levels tend to average out at the aggregate level.…”
Section: Uncertainty Issues In Existing Building Stock Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, the review of the literature related to the subject has been in the hands of Reinhart, & Cerezo Davila (2016), who have portrayed the different models of simulation and approximations. Although they deal with the organization of the inputs in the bottom-up models, they only indicate which parameters are normally used, so they leave a non-study area to continue with a deeper investigation linked to the importance of the correct choice of inputs.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%