2020
DOI: 10.3390/su12030809
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Urban Development Modeling Using Integrated Fuzzy Systems, Ordered Weighted Averaging (OWA), and Geospatial Techniques

Abstract: This paper proposes a model to identify the changing of bare grounds into built-up or developed areas. The model is based on the fuzzy system and the Ordered Weighted Averaging (OWA) methods. The proposed model consists of four main sections, which include physical suitability, accessibility, the neighborhood effect, and a calculation of the overall suitability. In the first two parts, physical suitability and accessibility were obtained by defining fuzzy inference systems and applying the required map data as… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, we attempt to compare the accuracy of different deep learning models applied to remote sensing datasets based on the common metrics [83] used to evaluate the efficiency of the proposed approaches for road extraction. Popular evaluation measures are calculated based on a confusion matrix comprising four main factors, namely, false negative (FN), true negative, true positive, and FP [83,84]. A general comparison of all the methods used in all datasets is provided to elaborate on the most efficient technique for road extraction (Figure 7).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, we attempt to compare the accuracy of different deep learning models applied to remote sensing datasets based on the common metrics [83] used to evaluate the efficiency of the proposed approaches for road extraction. Popular evaluation measures are calculated based on a confusion matrix comprising four main factors, namely, false negative (FN), true negative, true positive, and FP [83,84]. A general comparison of all the methods used in all datasets is provided to elaborate on the most efficient technique for road extraction (Figure 7).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Node splitting and merging are driven by the minimization of the same objective function during training, in this case, the weighted sum of entropies at the leaves. Results from a variety of datasets demonstrate that DJs need significantly less memory than DFs and various other baselines, while significantly enhancing generalization [53].…”
Section: Azure Cloud Platform and Machine Learning Classifiers Usedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, four principal calculation measurements, namely, overall accuracy (OA) (5), F1 score (6), recall (7), and precision ( 8) are utilized on the basis of the confusion matrix (Ghasemkhani et al 2020) with four main factors, such as false negative (FN), false positive (FP), true negative (TN), and true positive (TP), to assess the model performance for extracting building features from high-resolution aerial imagery. OA is specified as the sum of rightly identified pixels divided by the entire number of pixels.…”
Section: Evaluation Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%