2016 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/pesgm.2016.7741545
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Urban distribution grid topology reconstruction via Lasso

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effectiveness of mutual information was discussed from the perspective of conditional probability. Similarly, based on the assumption that the correlation between interconnected neighboring buses is higher than that between [162] non-neighbor buses, the topology identification problem was formulated as a probabilistic graph model and a Lasso-based sparse estimation problem in [166]. How to choose the regularization parameter for Lasso regression was also discussed.…”
Section: A Connection Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effectiveness of mutual information was discussed from the perspective of conditional probability. Similarly, based on the assumption that the correlation between interconnected neighboring buses is higher than that between [162] non-neighbor buses, the topology identification problem was formulated as a probabilistic graph model and a Lasso-based sparse estimation problem in [166]. How to choose the regularization parameter for Lasso regression was also discussed.…”
Section: A Connection Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given noisy specifications, the CPSSE task was next tackled using actual data and the SDP-based solver of (15). Load and solar generation on the IEEE 34-bus grid was taken from the Pecan Street dataset between 10:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. on January 1, 2013 [19].…”
Section: Numerical Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this test, the measurement noise was simulated as Gaussian with zero mean and standard deviation of 0.01 for voltages and 0.015 for power injections. The coupling equations in (15) were weighted by 0.035 and α was set to 2 in all tests.…”
Section: Numerical Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The solutions to (12) and (20) were projected onto B by setting their L largest entries to one and nulling the rest. The convex problem in (20) was solved using both the PGD iterates of (14), and the FW iterates of (22). The nonconvex problem of (12) was solved solely by the PGD scheme, since the FW iterates are guaranteed to converge only under a non-trivial step size selection [32].…”
Section: Numerical Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%