2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2012.09.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Urban energy, carbon management (low carbon cities) and co-benefits for human health

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the major source of greenhouse gas (GHG) emission, cities have been under tremendous pressure for energy conservation and emission reduction for decades [6][7][8], and have a limited capacity to reduce GHG due to consistently fast urbanization [9]. Improving dioxide carbon sequestration and storage by urban ecosystem is another effective way that will have benefits for social and economic aspects [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As the major source of greenhouse gas (GHG) emission, cities have been under tremendous pressure for energy conservation and emission reduction for decades [6][7][8], and have a limited capacity to reduce GHG due to consistently fast urbanization [9]. Improving dioxide carbon sequestration and storage by urban ecosystem is another effective way that will have benefits for social and economic aspects [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until recent years, there has been growing evidence that activities to mitigate climate variation can have beneficial impacts on public health, with the need to avoid adverse environmental, social and economic consequences [1][2][3][4][5][6]. As the major source of greenhouse gas (GHG) emission, cities have been under tremendous pressure for energy conservation and emission reduction for decades [6][7][8], and have a limited capacity to reduce GHG due to consistently fast urbanization [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reviewed articles range from overviews of previous articles [40,41,58,[60][61][62][63] and methodological issues [36,42,46,47,52,59,63,65] to scenario projections of potential health benefits for particular urban areas -Santiago de Chile (Chile) [64] and London (UK) and Delhi (India) [45]. Here, one could notice that air quality related co-benefits are listed both within environmental and health co-benefits.…”
Section: Recent Contributions To the Co-benefits Literature In The Trmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…As the United Nations Human Settlements Programme claimed, there is no globally accepted definition of city, and there are no globally accepted standards for recording emissions from sub-national areas [17,18]. It is easily understandable that there is no globally accepted definition of a low-carbon city.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%