2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12517-019-4258-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Urban environmental and land cover change analysis using the scatter plot, kernel, and neural network methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While previous studies were successful in predicting future LULC change, their results were based on discrete patches of LULC change which promotes a piecemeal approach to LULC change management. Other studies have successfully used spatially explicit models based on different sets of environmental factors to predict the probability of occurrence (susceptibility) of LULC change [24,25,53]. However, one of the shortcomings of these studies is that they could not deduce the spread pathways of LULC change and strategic pinch points for intervention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While previous studies were successful in predicting future LULC change, their results were based on discrete patches of LULC change which promotes a piecemeal approach to LULC change management. Other studies have successfully used spatially explicit models based on different sets of environmental factors to predict the probability of occurrence (susceptibility) of LULC change [24,25,53]. However, one of the shortcomings of these studies is that they could not deduce the spread pathways of LULC change and strategic pinch points for intervention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite its tremendous potential to provide spatially explicit predictions on spread pathways that are relevant to sustainable conservation, the application of connectivity analysis in LULC studies remains scanty. Previous studies have been able to predict the distribution and extent of LULC change in TDBs using spatially explicit models that stochastically forecast locations of LULC change patches based on either potential-transition maps that indicate the likelihood of a LULC transition or potential-occurrence maps that indicate the spatial susceptibility of land-cover types [21][22][23][24][25]. Their outputs were mainly patch-based projections of LULC change and the probability of LULC change maps.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visual image interpretation was used for land use/land cover and geomorphological classification. Initially, a false color composite (FCC) of infrared:red:green (IR:R:G) as RGB was used to understand different land use/land cover and geomorphological classes [26]. It must be noted the vegetation class has maximum spectral reflectance in the infrared band (IR), and as such, it has been used as a standard spectral band for mapping vegetation classes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Worldwide, academia has mainly employed a variety of automatic land classification approaches in their studies to extract the timely spatial data of land use land cover change (LULCC) considering remote sensing (i.e., Landsat, etc.) images, such as; maximum likelihood classification (MLC) [ 49 , 54 , [55] , [56] , [57] , [58] , 59 , 60 ], minimum distance classification ( ) [ 61 , 62 ], random forest (RF) [ 24 , 50 , 63 ], support vector machine (SVM) [ [64] , [65] , [66] ], multi-layer perception neural network (MLP NN) [ 62 , 67 ], and object-oriented classification [ [68] , [69] , [70] ] methods, etc.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%