Insect Conservation and Urban Environments 2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-21224-1_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Urban Environments and Insect Wellbeing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As regards the urban–rural gradient, many studies identified a negative trend (for reviews, see Sadler et al 2006; Jones & Leather 2012; New 2015), which is consistent with Predictions 3 and 7. However, other studies found peaks of insect species richness at the gradient mid-point (for reviews, see Blair & Launer 1997; Marzluff 2005; Jones & Leather 2012; New 2015). Most studies regarding insects have dealt with carabid beetles, butterflies and hymenopterans, with patterns varying according to the ecology of the concerned group (New 2015).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 57%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As regards the urban–rural gradient, many studies identified a negative trend (for reviews, see Sadler et al 2006; Jones & Leather 2012; New 2015), which is consistent with Predictions 3 and 7. However, other studies found peaks of insect species richness at the gradient mid-point (for reviews, see Blair & Launer 1997; Marzluff 2005; Jones & Leather 2012; New 2015). Most studies regarding insects have dealt with carabid beetles, butterflies and hymenopterans, with patterns varying according to the ecology of the concerned group (New 2015).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…However, other studies found peaks of insect species richness at the gradient mid-point (for reviews, see Blair & Launer 1997; Marzluff 2005; Jones & Leather 2012; New 2015). Most studies regarding insects have dealt with carabid beetles, butterflies and hymenopterans, with patterns varying according to the ecology of the concerned group (New 2015). No urban–rural gradient effect was found for Rome tenebrionids (Fattorini 2014a), possibly because these insects include both species associated with arid and sandy soils (which can be considered to be urban avoiders) and species associated with ruderal and archaeological sites (which can be considered to be urban adapters).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We found that deciduous and native tree species were predominant in the rural site, whereas the suburban site was mainly composed of coniferous species and non-native deciduous trees. This difference is likely to cause a large decrease in insect abundance 38 , 39 , especially for caterpillars of the Phryganidia spp which are more abundant on deciduous trees rather than on coniferous trees 40 , 41 . In this regard, similar to previous studies 30 , 31 , 37 , 42 we found that caterpillar biomass was higher in the rural site compared to the suburban counterpart.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%