2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-019-7451-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Urban expansion simulation and scenario prediction using cellular automata: comparison between individual and multiple influencing factors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The major differences between these two scenarios are observed near water bodies, as shown by the line chart. This may be due to the fact that the same facilities or service points can cause very different contributions to the urban scenario prediction when they are reflected by different methods, such as proximity and accessibility (Feng, Wang, Tong, & Shafizadeh-Moghadam, Cai, et al, 2019). Meanwhile, in both models, changes in the urban centroid are found within a 3 × 3 km rectangle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The major differences between these two scenarios are observed near water bodies, as shown by the line chart. This may be due to the fact that the same facilities or service points can cause very different contributions to the urban scenario prediction when they are reflected by different methods, such as proximity and accessibility (Feng, Wang, Tong, & Shafizadeh-Moghadam, Cai, et al, 2019). Meanwhile, in both models, changes in the urban centroid are found within a 3 × 3 km rectangle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the railway's proximity factor promotes urban growth while its accessibility factor resists urban growth. In addition to the calculation methods of quantizing factors, the correlation among factors would cause the changes in their effects on urban growth (Feng, Wang, Tong, Shafizadeh-Moghadam, Cai, et al, 2019).…”
Section: Resistmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CA is considered the simplest type of dynamic spatial model (Sfa et al, 2020;White & Engelen, 2000) and is a grid-based modeling approach where each cell is in a specific state, in this case, specific land use or cover. Five important components prepared and determined in the CA process, including cell space, cell state, neighborhood, transition rules, and iteration time (Feng et al, 2019). Time runs in discrete time steps.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…erefore, how to guarantee a continuous demand for urban land for socialeconomic development in the new era and how to clarify the formation mechanism of urban growth in order to reasonably control the urban scale, delimit the urban growth boundary, and optimize the spatial pattern of urban land have become the working emphases of current urban management [11,12]. Scholars have carried out extensive research to clarify those factors that drive urban expansion [13,14], strengthen the development and application of dynamic monitoring technologies for urban expansion [15,16], and accelerate sustainable urban spatial planning [17]. e scientific literature is an important and authoritative knowledge carrier.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%