2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2016.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Urban geometry and solar availability on façades and ground of real urban forms: using London as a case study

Abstract: The version in the Kent Academic Repository may differ from the final published version. Users are advised to check http://kar.kent.ac.uk for the status of the paper. Users should always cite the published version of record.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
63
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(37 reference statements)
0
63
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the buildings in the developments Polje and Brdo are set back from the building plot boundary, which would suggest even lower VDF avg values at the same FAR value, in comparison to the models. This, however, does not signify that the rooms in the studied developments are not successfully daylit, as the relationship of the building form with indoor illumination is not as straightforward as it is with received solar irradiation on the external facades and with the energy potential of a building [48]. Urban indicators are inadequate for a complete daylight prediction, since individual characteristics that pertain to interior layout (e.g., room distribution, room depths, etc.)…”
Section: Implications Of the Results For Urban Planning Parameters Inmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Additionally, the buildings in the developments Polje and Brdo are set back from the building plot boundary, which would suggest even lower VDF avg values at the same FAR value, in comparison to the models. This, however, does not signify that the rooms in the studied developments are not successfully daylit, as the relationship of the building form with indoor illumination is not as straightforward as it is with received solar irradiation on the external facades and with the energy potential of a building [48]. Urban indicators are inadequate for a complete daylight prediction, since individual characteristics that pertain to interior layout (e.g., room distribution, room depths, etc.)…”
Section: Implications Of the Results For Urban Planning Parameters Inmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…It is a useful new finding to be applied in supporting the development of science and technology and procurement related to vertical housing that provides opportunities for better life quality and energy efficiency in urban areas. Chatzipoulka et al [66] have aimed to explore relationships between urban geometry and solar availability on building façades and at the pedestrian level, with implications for buildings' passive potential and outdoor thermal comfort, respectively. The study was based on the morphological and solar analysis of 24 urban forms of London, covering a wide range of built density values found across the city.…”
Section: Previous Related Research and Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method is appropriate for urban areas with low buildings. Other studies have focused on both building roofs and façades using simple box-shaped buildings [20][21][22]. They calculated solar potential in each plane of the building containing a vertical plane.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%