2015
DOI: 10.4236/cus.2015.31004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Urban Governance and Poverty Reduction in Uganda: Lessons from Foreign Aid Regime of Local Government Development Program

Abstract: Government of Uganda implemented the Local Government Development Program (LGDP) between 2000 and 2009 with support from multilateral and bilateral agencies. Unlike previous policies such as Structural Adjustment Programs (SAP's) and Liberalization Policies, LGDP was designed to address poverty following a participatory approach. The participatory approach involved improvement of service delivery where local communities identified, prioritized and implemented development projects. This approach ensured demand-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Without measures being introduced that enable participation, the devolution of climate finance to local government may exacerbate bureaucratic control and patronage, rather than increase local discretion and downwards accountability (Mansuri and Rao, 2013). National governments can advance procedural justice by encouraging local governments to adopt participatory budgeting systems, a common practice in Brazilian cities (Cabannes, 2004), or participatory monitoring and evaluation procedures, as Uganda has done (Lwasa, 2015). There remains a risk that climate and other development interventions could serve the interests of the elite, but a commitment to recognition and representation could "shift the terms of debate [and] make space for alternatives" (Bulkeley et al, 2014: pp 33).…”
Section: Financial Planning Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Without measures being introduced that enable participation, the devolution of climate finance to local government may exacerbate bureaucratic control and patronage, rather than increase local discretion and downwards accountability (Mansuri and Rao, 2013). National governments can advance procedural justice by encouraging local governments to adopt participatory budgeting systems, a common practice in Brazilian cities (Cabannes, 2004), or participatory monitoring and evaluation procedures, as Uganda has done (Lwasa, 2015). There remains a risk that climate and other development interventions could serve the interests of the elite, but a commitment to recognition and representation could "shift the terms of debate [and] make space for alternatives" (Bulkeley et al, 2014: pp 33).…”
Section: Financial Planning Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%