2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.tfp.2021.100175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Urban green space characteristics, visitation patterns and influence of visitors’ socio-economic attributes on visitation in Kisumu City and Eldoret Municipality, Kenya

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Married or cohabiting residents were more likely to use green spaces compared to residents who have never married. Our finding is consistent with the findings of a study conducted in Kisumu and Eldoret, Kenya [51] that found respondents who were divorced, separated and widowed to be 4.71 times more likely to visit green spaces weekly than unmarried respondents (AOR = 4.71, 95% CI: 1.276, 17.356). Compared to skilled and unskilled manual workers, we found professional, technical and managerial workers to be less likely to use green spaces and could be attributed to white collar workers having limited time to access green spaces due either their busy work schedules or engagement in other leisure activities such as playing tennis.…”
Section: Plos Onesupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Married or cohabiting residents were more likely to use green spaces compared to residents who have never married. Our finding is consistent with the findings of a study conducted in Kisumu and Eldoret, Kenya [51] that found respondents who were divorced, separated and widowed to be 4.71 times more likely to visit green spaces weekly than unmarried respondents (AOR = 4.71, 95% CI: 1.276, 17.356). Compared to skilled and unskilled manual workers, we found professional, technical and managerial workers to be less likely to use green spaces and could be attributed to white collar workers having limited time to access green spaces due either their busy work schedules or engagement in other leisure activities such as playing tennis.…”
Section: Plos Onesupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Thus, recreational activities should not be explained or appreciated solely on the basis of physical attributes of UGBS such as noise or naturalness but also by personal characteristics such as gender, age or income. Second, future work should verify not only the frequency of activities in UGBS, but also the motivation and distance travelled by UGBS users [31,[84][85][86][87], and the park characteristics they appreciate [88,89]. Green-space attractiveness may depend on numerous factors such as the presence of facilities, culture and history, safety, amenities, quality of the biodiversity, and public transport [28,66,[90][91][92][93][94].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Petucco et al [4] incorporated tourist characteristics and recreation preferences into the sustainable use of forests. Meanwhile, Ghimire and other scholars gradually began to pay attention to research on the landscape preferences and behavior characteristics of tourists with different attributes and pointed out that there are significant differences in users' preferences for outdoor recreation space in terms of gender, marital status, educational background and working experience [16][17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Importance Of Meeting the Needs Of Diversified Touristsmentioning
confidence: 99%