2014
DOI: 10.1080/10962247.2014.904252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Urban impacts on regional carbonaceous aerosols: Case study in central Texas

Abstract: Rural and background sites provide valuable information on the concentration and optical properties of organic, elemental, and water-soluble organic carbon (OC, EC, and WSOC), which are relevant for understanding the climate forcing potential of regional atmospheric aerosols. Implications: Background concentration and absorption measurements are essential in determining regional potential radiative forcing due to atmospheric aerosols. Back trajectory, chemical, and optical analysis of PM 2.5 was used to determ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The OM mass was estimated from OC measurements using site‐specific factors, which depend on the emission source composition (Barrett & Sheesley, ), the extent of OM oxidation, and secondary organic aerosol formation (Aiken et al, ; Barrett & Sheesley, ; Chow et al, ). Based on measurements during the Texas Air Quality Study and Gulf of Mexico Atmospheric Composition and Climate Study (Barrett & Sheesley, ; Bates et al, ; Russell et al, ), empirical factors of 1.7 and 1.8 were used for Clinton Drive and Galveston, respectively. Note that these factors lie between reported values of 1.2 for fresh (urban) aerosols and 2.6 for aged (nonurban or rural) aerosols (Chow et al, , and references therein).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The OM mass was estimated from OC measurements using site‐specific factors, which depend on the emission source composition (Barrett & Sheesley, ), the extent of OM oxidation, and secondary organic aerosol formation (Aiken et al, ; Barrett & Sheesley, ; Chow et al, ). Based on measurements during the Texas Air Quality Study and Gulf of Mexico Atmospheric Composition and Climate Study (Barrett & Sheesley, ; Bates et al, ; Russell et al, ), empirical factors of 1.7 and 1.8 were used for Clinton Drive and Galveston, respectively. Note that these factors lie between reported values of 1.2 for fresh (urban) aerosols and 2.6 for aged (nonurban or rural) aerosols (Chow et al, , and references therein).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inorganic cations included sodium, potassium, magnesium, lithium, calcium, and ammonium. The QFF extraction was previously reported in Barrett and Sheesley (2014). Briefly, soluble ions on the QFF were extracted by sonication and centrifugation in 25 ml of deionized water (Barrett & Sheesley, 2014).…”
Section: Ion Chromatographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The QFF extraction was previously reported in Barrett and Sheesley (2014). Briefly, soluble ions on the QFF were extracted by sonication and centrifugation in 25 ml of deionized water (Barrett & Sheesley, 2014). Field blanks and filter blanks were extracted in the same manner and included with each 10.1029/2020JD033225 analysis, and calibration curve check standards were run frequently.…”
Section: Ion Chromatographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…WSOC analysis was performed using a previously described method [ Barrett and Sheesley , ]. Briefly, filter areas corresponding to ~75 μg of OC, based on filter loading, were placed in 50 mL centrifuge tubes (Bio‐Link Scientific, Wimberly, TX) and sonicated in 30 mL of deionized (DI) water for 15 min.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%