2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Urban livestock ownership, management, and regulation in the United States: An exploratory survey and research agenda

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
29
1
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
29
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, many cities in the US have passed specific ordinances permitting certain commercial, community, or non-profit agricultural activity. For example, municipalities such as Vancouver (Broadway and Broadway 2011), Cleveland (Grewal and Grewal 2012) and NYC (Mees and Stone 2012) have enacted laws regarding keeping livestock and zoning regulations for UA (McClintock et al 2014). Masson-Minock and Stockmann (2010) and Castillo et al (2013) found further need for regulation in UA in their case studies in Flint, Michigan, and in Chicago.…”
Section: Legal Statusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, many cities in the US have passed specific ordinances permitting certain commercial, community, or non-profit agricultural activity. For example, municipalities such as Vancouver (Broadway and Broadway 2011), Cleveland (Grewal and Grewal 2012) and NYC (Mees and Stone 2012) have enacted laws regarding keeping livestock and zoning regulations for UA (McClintock et al 2014). Masson-Minock and Stockmann (2010) and Castillo et al (2013) found further need for regulation in UA in their case studies in Flint, Michigan, and in Chicago.…”
Section: Legal Statusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and respondents were asked to disseminate it to their contacts (snowball sampling strategy) (Conrad et al, 2011;McClintock et al, 2014). These institutions were selected because of their relation with recreation services at different scales in the Basque Country.…”
Section: Social Preferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Socio-demographic considerations were taken into account to ensure that a range of ages, genders, geographical background, educational level and occupations were included within this initial group. This sampling strategy allows for practical benefits including efficiency and reduced cost, although it is also known to involve constraints with respect to sample representativeness (Conrad et al, 2011) and calculation of response rate (McClintock et al, 2014).…”
Section: Social Preferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several factors such as geographical location, livestock species and numbers, socio-economic background of livestock keepers and livestock management are important determinants of the diversity of urban and peri-urban livestock farm types [7][8][9]. According to [10], urban livestock keeping is small-scale, often dominated by poultry, pigs and pet animals such as rabbits, and the space devoted to animals is relatively small [11]. Animals are fed on food wastes from the household, restaurants and communal institutions, as well as from industrial processes of e.g., breweries or canning factories [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%