Urban Mining's Potential to Relieve China's Coming Resource Crisis

Abstract

SummaryChina's mineral resource consumption has gone through multiple increases since 1980, resulting in the inadequacy of important strategic resources and a high level of external dependence. Some developed countries have already reduced primary resources consumption through urban mining. Can China also break through the bottleneck of the resource shortage and continue its economic and social development through strengthening of urban mining? This article selected copper (Cu), aluminum (Al), lead (Pb), and iron (Fe) as case studies and established predictive models for metal demand, recycling, and stock, based on stock analysis, material flow analysis, and a life distribution model, and then analyzed the metabolism of the four resources and compared the environmental effects of three scenarios. The study indicates that the urban mining potential of Cu, Fe, Al, and Pb will attain 8.1, 711.6, 37.0, and 12.1 million tonnes, respectively, in 2040. Compared with 2010, the substitution rate (secondary metals substituting primary metals) of Cu and Fe increase by 25.4% and 59.9%, whereas external dependence decreases by 30.8% and 25.7%. However, substitution is not obvious regarding Al and Pb. The low resource scenario decreases resources use, which will reduce external dependence in the short term, whereas the strengthened recovery scenario increases resource recovery and has a larger effect in reducing external dependence in the long term. So, in line with urban mining in the future, China should change its environment and resource strategy, further strengthen layout and construction of urban mining demonstration bases, and encourage the use of recyclable resources to provide a better foundation for urban mining. Keywords:industrial ecology life cycle metals recycling stock analysis urban mining Supporting information is available on the JIE Web site

Winners of the 2015 Graedel Prizes: The JIE Best Paper Prizes

“…Pauliuk and colleagues () is a clear winner in the junior author category, followed by Nassar and colleagues () and Patricio and colleagues (). In the senior author category, the paper by Heller and Keoleian () was ranked first and slightly better than papers by Scanlon and colleagues () and Wen and colleagues (). The other papers that were nominated and therefore worth mentioning are specified in the reference list at the end of this article (Ahmad and Derrible ; Guignot et al.…”

Anticipating urban mining

“…Ambitions for the future remain high: in China, copper, iron, aluminium and lead substitution rates in (replacement of primary metal sources by secondary ones) through urban mining can be up to 50% by 2030 [8,9]. Recycling of metals is also significant within the waste industry itself, as it significantly reduces its net carbon footprint [10].…”

Location Optimization of Urban Mining Facilities with Maximal Covering Model in GIS: A Case of China

“…Wen and colleagues find that China will attain 8.1 million tonnes (Mt) of copper and 711.6 Mt of iron from urban mining by 2040, which will substitute 25.4% and 59.9% of the consumption (Wen et al. ). Urban mining provides a systematic and comprehensive approach to manage materials and wastes for long‐term benefits (Cossu ).…”