2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10021-013-9718-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Urban Morphology Drives the Homogenization of Tree Cover in Baltimore, MD, and Raleigh, NC

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
54
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
8
54
2
Order By: Relevance
“…) and the homogenization of tree cover (Bigsby et al. ). Global comparative analyses of urban morphology are essential not only to identify the urban forms that best support multiple elements of native biodiversity but also to inform decisions related to urban planning and the conservation of biological diversity.…”
Section: Filters Of Community Assembly In Citiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…) and the homogenization of tree cover (Bigsby et al. ). Global comparative analyses of urban morphology are essential not only to identify the urban forms that best support multiple elements of native biodiversity but also to inform decisions related to urban planning and the conservation of biological diversity.…”
Section: Filters Of Community Assembly In Citiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Legacies therefore may have as much influence on vegetation characteristics as present socioeconomic status or ongoing land management in a given area of interest [35]. This is well illustrated by the distribution of tree canopy cover in Baltimore (MD, US), which is largely associated with higher socioeconomic status, except for some lower income neighborhoods where higher canopy cover is attributable to legacies of decades-old plantings [53]. By extension, urban morphology can affect related ecosystem (dis)services, including amenities like carbon sequestration, harborage of more diverse ecological communities, and mitigation of air pollutants and the heat island effect.…”
Section: Ecosystem Structure Function and (Dis)servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bigsby et al (2013) delineated six groundcover types at a 1-m resolution, which included tree, water, road, building, grass, and bare-ground classifications. We used impervious surface and coarse vegetation cover because these classifications comprised greater than 97% of the groundcover within 100 m of each of our study trees.…”
Section: Ground Covermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To examine the habitat around each study site on a larger scale, we analyzed the ground cover around each tree in ArcMap (ArcGIS10) using impervious surface and coarse vegetation groundcover data in Raleigh, North Carolina (Bigsby et al 2013). Bigsby et al (2013) delineated six groundcover types at a 1-m resolution, which included tree, water, road, building, grass, and bare-ground classifications.…”
Section: Ground Covermentioning
confidence: 99%