2012
DOI: 10.5194/isprsannals-i-3-215-2012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Urban Object Extraction From Digital Surface Model and Digital Aerial Images

Abstract: ABSTRACT:The paper describes two different methods for extraction of two types of urban objects from lidar digital surface model (DSM) and digital aerial images. Within the preprocessing digital terrain model (DTM) and orthoimages for three test areas were generated from aerial images using automatic photogrammetric methods. Automatic building extraction was done using DSM and multispectral orthoimages. First, initial building mask was created from the normalized digital surface model (nDSM), then vegetation w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…NDVI has been used extensively in literature to eliminate vegetation and classify scenes [15,22,25,35]. Nevertheless, many authors [2,15] emphasised to couple it with entropy, since NDVI alone is not a promising feature to handle shadows and coloured buildings.…”
Section: Aerial Image Generated Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…NDVI has been used extensively in literature to eliminate vegetation and classify scenes [15,22,25,35]. Nevertheless, many authors [2,15] emphasised to couple it with entropy, since NDVI alone is not a promising feature to handle shadows and coloured buildings.…”
Section: Aerial Image Generated Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the success of this method is completely dependent on the quality of the nDSM, which is generally not available for many areas. Following the mask generation process in [15], Grigillo et al [25] eliminated the vegetation under shadows by truncating areas with low homogeneity. However, this method fails to address occlusion and works well when trees are isolated and produces inaccurate building boundary when surrounded by trees.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially morphological filtering is applied in the majority of case studies. Admittedly, it is not always employed as a form of postprocessing to improve the final output, but equally during the workflow to smooth the result of a workflow step before further processing [73,120,121,126]. When applied at the end of the workflow in case studies on road extraction, morphological filtering is often combined with skeletons to extract the vectorized centerline of the road [79,125,142,196,198].…”
Section: Feature Extraction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Morphological operators are employed as a postprocessing step to smooth the contour of detected line features [195]. Morphological operators [73,75,79,115,116,120,121,126,128,146,148,196,198,199] [132] [124,125,142,144,200] Remote Sens. 2016, 8, 689…”
Section: Postprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Haala (1997) conducted urban land use classification using aerial images, DSM (digital surface model) and the existing 2D Geographic Information Systems (GIS). Grigillo (2012) integrated the LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) and aerial image to extract building and vegetation. Charaniya (2004) classified aerial LiDAR height data into roads, grass, buildings, and trees using a supervised parametric classification algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%