Partitioning evapotranspiration (ET) into its constituent components, evaporation (E) and transpiration (T), is important for numerous hydrological purposes including assessing impacts of management practices on water use efficiency and improved validation of vadose zone models that parameterize E and T separately. However, most long-established observational techniques have short observational timescales and spatial footprints, raising questions about the representativeness of these measurements. In the past 15 yr, new approaches have allowed ET partitioning at spatial scales ranging from the pedon to the globe and at long timescales. In this update, we review some recent methodological developments for partitioning ET. These include micrometeorological approaches involving the flux variance partitioning of high-frequency eddy covariance observations and proxies for photosynthesis and transpiration such as measurements of isotopic fractionation and carbonyl sulfide uptake. We discuss advances in partitioning the energy balance between canopy and soil using remote sensing. We conclude that the flux variance partitioning with raw eddy covariance data and the two-source energy balance approaches with remote sensing platforms may have the greatest potential for partitioning ET, in part because large public repositories of eddy covariance and satellite data could be readily reprocessed to partition ET.Abbreviations: COS, carbonyl sulfide; CRDS, cavity ring-down spectroscopy; ECV, eddy covariance; ET, evapotranspiration; FVP, flux variance partitioning; ICOS, integrated cavity output spectroscopy; TSEB, two-source energy balance; UAV, unmanned aerial vehicle; WUE, water use efficiency.Evapotranspiration (ET) is one of the largest hydrologic fluxes on Earth, accounting for approximately 60% of terrestrial precipitation globally (Haddeland et al., 2011) or about 6.5 to 6.8 ´ 10 4 km 3 water yr −1 (Oki and Kanae, 2006;Jung et al., 2010;Miralles et al., 2011). Evapotranspiration is clearly one of the most important boundary conditions for vadose zone studies, and it is well recognized that there are numerous controls on the amount of ET, including meteorological and vegetation conditions (Williams et al., 2012;Puma et al., 2013) and soil moisture Jung et al., 2010). Depending on the temporal and spatial scale, ET can be observed with a wide variety of techniques including lysimetry (Gee and Hillel, 1988;Poss et al., 2004;Johnson et al., 2005), micrometeorology (including eddy covariance) (Snyder et al., 1996;Todd et al., 2000;Hemakumara et al., 2003;Williams et al., 2004), satellite remote sensing (Bastiaanssen et al., 1998;Allen et al., 2007;Senay et al., 2013), water balance (Wilson et al., 2001;Zeng et al., 2014), or a combination approach (Nagler et al., 2005;Anderson and Goulden, 2009;Goulden et al., 2012;Zhang et al., 2015). Evapotranspiration can be modeled with a variety of models, ranging from complex, mechanistic equations (Monteith, 1965) to simple, empirical formulae (Makkink, 1957;Hargreaves and Samani, 1985...