2017
DOI: 10.1093/cdj/bsx012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Urban redevelopment and the expulsion of a village: an urban village in Seoul and residents’ responses to the redevelopment project

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6). The intrinsic institutional arrangements of joint redevelopment generated a division among the original residents as it aligned the interests of land-owning residents with the developer and incentivized landowners to counteract protests or other delays by tenants (Kwon, 2018;Shin and Kim, 2015). Rather than having a mutual, collaborative character, the regulations antagonized different stakeholder groups and institutionalized financial hurdles that obstruct the participation of economically weaker landowners (Ha, 2001;Shin, 2009).…”
Section: Network Models Of Coordination During the Second Urban Trans...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6). The intrinsic institutional arrangements of joint redevelopment generated a division among the original residents as it aligned the interests of land-owning residents with the developer and incentivized landowners to counteract protests or other delays by tenants (Kwon, 2018;Shin and Kim, 2015). Rather than having a mutual, collaborative character, the regulations antagonized different stakeholder groups and institutionalized financial hurdles that obstruct the participation of economically weaker landowners (Ha, 2001;Shin, 2009).…”
Section: Network Models Of Coordination During the Second Urban Trans...mentioning
confidence: 99%