Urban regeneration ‘from the bottom up’

Abstract

Urban regeneration 'from the bottom up' Article No: CCIT1242240 Enclosures: 1) Query sheet 2) Article proofs Dear Author, 1. Please check these proofs carefully. It is the responsibility of the corresponding author to check these and approve or amend them. A second proof is not normally provided. Taylor & Francis cannot be held responsible for uncorrected errors, even if introduced during the production process. Once your corrections have been added to the article, it will be considered ready for publication. Please limit changes at this stage to the correction of errors. You should not make trivial changes, improve prose style, add new material, or delete existing material at this stage. You may be charged if your corrections are excessive (we would not expect corrections to exceed 30 changes). For detailed guidance on how to check your proofs, please paste this address into a new browser window: http://journalauthors.tandf.co.uk/production/checkingproofs.asp Your PDF proof file has been enabled so that you can comment on the proof directly using Adobe Acrobat. If you wish to do this, please save the file to your hard disk first. For further information on marking corrections using Acrobat, please paste this address into a new browser window: http:// journalauthors.tandf.co.uk/production/acrobat.asp 2. Please review the table of contributors below and confirm that the first and last names are structured correctly and that the authors are listed in the correct order of contribution. This check is to ensure that your name will appear correctly online and when the article is indexed. Sequence Prefix Given name(s) Surname Suffix 1 Chiara Rabbiosi Queries are marked in the margins of the proofs, and you can also click the hyperlinks below. Content changes made during copy-editing are shown as tracked changes. Inserted text is in red font and revisions have a red indicator. Changes can also be viewed using the list comments function. To correct the proofs, you should insert or delete text following the instructions below, but do not add comments to the existing tracked changes.

The Importance of the Participatory Dimension in Urban Resilience Improvement Processes

“…Today, the debate is focused on citizen participation cases that have emerged from the proposals of concrete social groups [44] related to specific needs, and that have been developed outside the margins of public institutions and have sometimes even been much more successful. The survey of numerous "bottom-up regeneration processes" carried out in Europe [3,[44][45][46], which heterogeneously focus on the principles of the progressive redistribution of resources, ecological sustainability and social responsibility [44], highlights both the fundamental aim of these types of processes and the characteristics that set them apart from traditional processes promoted by public administrations. According to Squizzato [3], the fundamental aim of these projects is to improve the urban environment through non-governmental private projects and for a non-speculative purpose.…”

“…They benefit the community involved in several ways, not just by improving physical aspects of the space [44].…”

Obstacles to emancipation in neighborhood regeneration: The case study of Dong Gang New Town, Suzhou

“…Similarly, Galvin and Mooney Simmie (2017) approached civic participation in urban renewal from an adult education perspective, the so-called expansive participation, which requires project initiators to learn to understand marginalized community members rather than educating them. Recently, community regeneration was also discussed, which is urban regeneration initiated by strong communities and grass root organizations as an alternative to austerity urbanism (Nevin & Shiner, 1995;Pradel-Miquel, 2021;Rabbiosi, 2016). For instance, Rabbiosi (2016) demonstrated a community garden which was initiated by a civic society group in Milan.…”

Does Resident Participation in an Urban Regeneration Project Improve Neighborhood Satisfaction: A Case Study of “Amichojang” in Busan, South Korea

“…Healy [11] has pointed out that social networks, social capital, and residential participation can be efficient resources for enhancing urban regeneration and preventing social exclusion. With this perspective, numerous scholars have investigated how resident participation affects the success of urban regeneration [8,10,12,13]. This claim does not mean that the top-down approach driven by technical experts should be excluded in planning process.…”