Urban Renewal in Vancouver, Canada

Zuberi, Dan; Taylor, Ariel

doi:10.4324/9781315463735-5

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The Single Regeneration Budget (SRB) 13 was a single funding stream that resulted from the amalgamation of over twenty smaller regeneration-related programs. 14 The aims of this program included bringing about multifaceted, economic and social regeneration in often relatively small neighborhood areas. 15 The SRB evaluation methodology was designed to evaluate the process by which economic, social and physical regeneration is achieved at the local level.…”

Section: Critical Review Of the Current Assessment Methodologymentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessing Sustainability in Housing LED Urban Regeneration: Insights from a Housing Association in Northern England

Dean

Trillo

2019

Architecture_MPS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

How far do current assessment methods allow the thorough evaluation of sustainable urban regeneration? Would it be useful, to approach the evaluation of the environmental and social impacts of housing regeneration schemes, by making both hidden pitfalls and potentials explicit, and budgeting costs and benefits in the stakeholders' perspective? The paper aims at answering these questions, by focusing on a case study located in the Manchester area, the City West Housing Trust, a nonprofit housing association. Drawing from extensive fieldwork and including several interviews with key experts from this housing association, the paper first attempts to monetize the environmental and social value of two extant projects -a high-rise housing estate and an environmentally-led program. It then discusses whether and how a stakeholder-oriented approach would allow more engagement of both current and potential funders in the projects at hand. Findings from both the literature and the empirical data that was gathered show how in current housing

show abstract

Section: Critical Review Of the Current Assessment Methodologymentioning

confidence: 99%