Urban-Rural Development, Integration, and Governance

Ye, Lin

doi:10.1007/978-3-662-45040-6_5

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In Table 5, columns (4) and (5) show the results of the test with the living standard of rural residents (Lis) as the mediating variable. Column (4) shows that the digital economy has a significant positive impact on the living standard of rural residents; Column (5) shows that the digital economy and the living standard of rural residents have significantly promoted rural revitalization; It is also found that the influence coefficient and significance of the level of digital economy decrease, and the results of Sobel test are also significant, indicating that there is a partial intermediary effect. That is, the development of digital economy can promote the implementation of rural revitalization strategy by improving the living standards of rural residents.…”

Section: Residents' Living Standard (Lis)mentioning

confidence: 97%

“…From the perspective of rural industrial development, Tian Ye et al [4] found that the development of digital economy can promote rural industrial revitalization through the mechanism of urban-rural integration development, and its promotion effect will be different due to the different scale of agricultural labor. Zhou Qingxiang et al [5] found that digital economy can significantly promote the high-quality development of agriculture, enhance the comprehensive benefits of agricultural production and promote rural revitalization from the perspective of innovation, coordination, green, openness and sharing.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Effect Mechanism of Digital Economy Empowering Rural Revitalization

2023

infse

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Based on the panel data of 30 regions in China from 2011 to 2021, this paper establishes an index system of digital economy and rural revitalization, measures the level of digital economy and rural revitalization in each region, and deeply analyzes the impact of digital economy on rural revitalization by using two-way fixed effect model and intermediary effect model. It is found that digital economy can significantly promote rural revitalization, and this result is still valid after robustness test and endogenous test; The digital economy mainly affects the dimension of residents' "affluent life" in rural revitalization; The development of digital economy can promote rural revitalization by improving the basic transportation level, residents' living standards and expanding the scale of agricultural economy.

show abstract

Section: Residents' Living Standard (Lis)mentioning

confidence: 97%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Effect Mechanism of Digital Economy Empowering Rural Revitalization

2023

infse

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, in the middle and later stages of industrialisation, the nature of production processes has evolved to high-end technology. The workforce associated with this is much more selective about choosing where to gather and live (Ye & Tang, 2011), as the qualities of the urban environment are known to impact quality of life, well-being and the fulfilment of individual and community aspirations (De Haan et al, 2014). This makes clear that better living and working environments for high-tech industry professionals could support innovation.…”

Section: Technology Innovation and Spatial Factorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

From Dichotomies to Dialogues

Qu¹,

Dorst²

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The challenges cities and regions face now and in the future are enormous and uncertain, to be determined or affected by unexpected extreme events like pandemics, economic crises, and climate change. So, it is urgently needed to get beyond the dichotomies in urbanism, and, by default, urbanism should have the nature to combine these perspectives. To move forward, people involved in urbanism should be aware of each other’s knowledge, qualifications, and worldviews, taking any opportunity to transcend and connect different discourses to invent better ways of achieving resilience and sustainability. With the ambition to create such opportunities, the 14th conference of the International Forum on Urbanism (IFoU) in 2021 called for papers to contribute to dialogues in five tracks that represent five types of debates over a set of dichotomies. 1. “Urban-rural Integration” and “Areas In-Between” 2. The City is an Object and a City is in Transition 3. Political Ecology and Adaptive and Transformative Framework 4. Metropolization and the Right to the City 5. Human-centred and Nature-based Approaches in Cities

show abstract

Urban-Rural Development, Integration, and Governance

Cited by 2 publications

References 22 publications

The Effect Mechanism of Digital Economy Empowering Rural Revitalization

The Effect Mechanism of Digital Economy Empowering Rural Revitalization

From Dichotomies to Dialogues

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About