2019
DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Urban-rural differences in the association between blood lipids and characteristics of the built environment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: IntroductionThe built environment defines opportunities for healthy eating and physical activity and may thus be related to blood lipids. The aim of this study is to systematically analyse the scientific evidence on associations between built-environment characteristics and blood lipid levels in adults.MethodsPubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science were searched for peer-reviewed papers on population-based studies up to 9 October 2017. We included studies that reported on built-environment characteristics and blood … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
26
1
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
7
26
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is, to some extent, consistent with a previous longitudinal study conducted in the USA that found a greater increase in TG for those who moved to higher walkability neighborhoods from lower walkability neighborhoods [50]. A recent systematic review of mostly cross-sectional studies also found less favorable blood lipid levels among urban residents as compared with rural residents [51]. These inconsistent or unexpected findings may be due to other potentially relevant exposures not measured in this study, such as easier access to unhealthy food outlets [52], which may have some detrimental effects on blood pressure, glucose, and lipids.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This finding is, to some extent, consistent with a previous longitudinal study conducted in the USA that found a greater increase in TG for those who moved to higher walkability neighborhoods from lower walkability neighborhoods [50]. A recent systematic review of mostly cross-sectional studies also found less favorable blood lipid levels among urban residents as compared with rural residents [51]. These inconsistent or unexpected findings may be due to other potentially relevant exposures not measured in this study, such as easier access to unhealthy food outlets [52], which may have some detrimental effects on blood pressure, glucose, and lipids.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Our findings regarding the association between population density and blood lipid levels differ from the findings of previous studies, largely conducted in LMIC [8]. The absence of an association between population density and blood lipid levels may be explained by several factors, including differences between HIC and LMIC, the absence of information on either the food environment or food intake, the operationalization of urbanization used and the population under study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…the place where a person lives) is an ‘upstream’ determinant of health behavior and disease outcomes [57]. In a recent systematic review, we identified consistent associations between living in an urban area and having higher total cholesterol (TC), low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and triglyceride levels [8]. The studies included in this review were mainly conducted in low and middle-income countries (LMIC) and the patterns observed may have been attributable to the sedentary and inactive lifestyle associated with life in urban areas in LMIC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rosa de Groot (2018) revealed that LDL and TC and triglyceride levels are consistently less favorable in urban areas as compared with rural areas. 15 No overall differences in HDL-cholesterol were found between urban and rural areas. Anyway, differences in urban and rural areas are likely to become even more relevant as it is projected that 70% of the world's population will reside in urban areas by 2050.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%