2021
DOI: 10.18520/cs/v120/i7/1246-1249
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Urban Sustainability Analysis of Solan District, Himachal Pradesh, India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lowest ecological deficit of 21.795 g/ha in Palampur may be explained by the low levels of anthropocentricity in the region, as well as the relatively low levels of development in the area.The ecological deficit per capita in different urban areas ranged from 0.004 to 0.027 g ha/capita and followed the following pattern: Jawali (0.028 g ha/capita) > Jawalamukhi (0.027 g ha/capita) > Dehra (0.022 g ha/capita) > Nagrota (0.020 g ha/capita) > Dharamshala (0.018 g ha/capita) > Baijnath-Paprola (0.017 g ha/capita) > Nurpur (0.016 g ha/capita) > Kangra (0.011 g ha/capita) > Palampur (0.006 g ha/capita). The results are in congruence with the findings of Kandil et al (2020) and Pandit et al (2021);the per capita ecological deficit has no characteristic pattern because of varying geographical areas and capricious amount of population which has not relatively magnified in these areas. According to the data, the expanded built-up land footprint of different urban areas exceeds the biocapacity of the environment, rendering the system unsustainable and pointing out the existence of an Ecological Deficit (ED).…”
Section: Methods and Measurements Of Efa Toolsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The lowest ecological deficit of 21.795 g/ha in Palampur may be explained by the low levels of anthropocentricity in the region, as well as the relatively low levels of development in the area.The ecological deficit per capita in different urban areas ranged from 0.004 to 0.027 g ha/capita and followed the following pattern: Jawali (0.028 g ha/capita) > Jawalamukhi (0.027 g ha/capita) > Dehra (0.022 g ha/capita) > Nagrota (0.020 g ha/capita) > Dharamshala (0.018 g ha/capita) > Baijnath-Paprola (0.017 g ha/capita) > Nurpur (0.016 g ha/capita) > Kangra (0.011 g ha/capita) > Palampur (0.006 g ha/capita). The results are in congruence with the findings of Kandil et al (2020) and Pandit et al (2021);the per capita ecological deficit has no characteristic pattern because of varying geographical areas and capricious amount of population which has not relatively magnified in these areas. According to the data, the expanded built-up land footprint of different urban areas exceeds the biocapacity of the environment, rendering the system unsustainable and pointing out the existence of an Ecological Deficit (ED).…”
Section: Methods and Measurements Of Efa Toolsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…III Urban sustainability Urban sustainability is defined as the process by which measurable long-term social development can be achieved through actions in the environment, economic and social magnitude. The use of sustainability indicators is increasingly needed to achieve sustainability (Pandit et al, 2021). It truly is a multiscale and multidimensional issue that centersaround as well as rises above urban wards and which must be tended to by tough initiative, resident association, and territorial organizations alongside vertical collaborations among various legislative levels.There are four main principles to advance urban sustainability viz:Human and characteristic frameworks are solidly interlaced and met up in urban zones; Urban imbalance undermines supportability attempts; The planet has biophysical limits; Urban communities are astoundingly interconnected.…”
Section: Resource Use Pattern Of Urban and Rural Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%