Urban Violence and Street Gangs

Abstract

▪ Abstract What causes urban street gang violence, and how can we better understand the forces that shape this type of adolescent and youth behavior? For close to a century, social researchers have taken many different paths in attempting to unravel this complex question, especially in the context of large-scale immigrant adaptation to the city. In recent decades these researchers have relied primarily on data gathered from survey quantitative approaches. This review traces some of these developments and outlines how frameworks of analysis have become more integrated and multidimensional, as ethnographic strategies have come into vogue again. For the last couple of decades, either a subculture of violence (i.e., the values and norms of the street gang embrace aggressive, violent behavior) or a routine activities (i.e., hanging around high crime areas with highly delinquent people) explanation dominated the discussion. To broaden and deepen the picture, many other factors need to be considered, such as ecological, socioeconomic, sociocultural, and sociopsychological, particularly in light of the immigrant experience. A multiple marginality framework lends itself to a holistic strategy that examines linkages within the various factors and the actions and interactions among them and notes the cumulative nature of urban street gang violence. Questions that are addressed in this more integrated framework are: Where did they settle? What jobs did they fill? How and why did their social practices and cultural values undergo transformations? When and in what ways did the social environment affect them? Finally, with whom did they interact? In sum, in highlighting the key themes and features of what constitutes urban street gang violence, this review suggests that the qualitative style that relies on holistic information adds important details to traditional quantitative data.

Reducing Crime and Violence: Experimental Evidence from Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in Liberia

“…Such groups use similar techniques (appearance change, practice, modeling) to shape young men's social identity and behavior (Vigil 2003;Wood 2008;Maruna and Roy 2007). NEPI designed STYL to reverse this process.…”

Homies with Aspirations and Positive Peer Network Ties: Associations with Reduced Frequent Substance Use among Gang-Affiliated Latino Youth

“…Youth gangs often emerge from neighborhoods with entrenched poverty and racial and health disparities, conditions that also shape access to present and future socioeconomic prospects. 6,[50][51][52][53] These same contextual factors, including culture conflict, alienation from family and racial and ethnic discrimination, have also been associated with alcohol and drug use among Latino youth and adults. 17 ,r 54 There is a need for novel intervention approaches that address structural exposures and can better tackle multiple health outcomes, including frequent substance use, with common pathways.…”

“…2,3,5 A primary focus on punitive approaches to address criminal behavior can inhibit a broader understand-ing of the gang peer network and mask the marginalization and health disparities gang-involved youth face. 6 Alcohol and illicit substance use have been associated with gang-involved youth and are correlated with other high-risk health behaviors among Latino adolescents. [7][8][9] Public health researchers can contribute to gang intervention efforts by identifying risk and protective factors in the social environment and taking a non-criminal approach to addressing negative health behaviors, including alcohol and drug use.…”

Alternativas para la comprensión de la pobreza: hogares y capital social en México

“…Sin embargo, la reciprocidad implícita también puede ser una carga en la esfera individual, por ejemplo, cuando una persona es agobiada por la demanda de favores proveniente de familiares y amigos en determinado momento. Por otro lado, algunos grupos sociales con reservas importantes de capital social pueden acarrear repercusiones negativas en la dinámica de ciertas comunidades (Portes, y Landolt, 1996, 2000Vigil, 2003); el ejemplo más utilizado en este sentido es el de las mafias. No obstante, el aspecto positivo del capital social ha sido entendido como un mecanismo clave en el combate a la pobreza (Narayan, 1999;Portes, y Landolt, 2000;World Bank, 2006).…”